TPress

@article{Chitragari2014,

title = {Prosthetic options available for the diabetic lower limb amputee},

author = {G. Chitragari and D. B. Mahler and B. J. Sumpio and P. A. Blume and B. E. Sumpio},

url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L370343216&from=export},

doi = {10.1016/j.cpm.2013.09.008},

issn = {1558-2302},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

journal = {Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg.},

volume = {31},

number = {1},

pages = {174–185},

address = {B.E. Sumpio, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, BB 204, New Haven, CT 06520-8062, United States},

abstract = {Although the rate of lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes is decreasing, amputation still remains a major complication of diabetes. Prosthetics have been long used to help amputees ambulate. The last decade has seen many advances in prostheses with the enhanced understanding of the mechanics of ambulation and improved use of technology. This review describes the different types of prosthetic options available for below knee, ankle, and foot amputees, emphasizing the latest advances in prosthetic design. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.},

keywords = {ankle prosthesis, below knee prosthesis, C-leg, dermatitis, diabetes mellitus, diabetic patient, fluid control knee, gait, human, Hydraulic knee, iWALK, joint stability, knee function, leg amputation, leg prosthesis, Manual locking Knee, microprocessor knee, mobilization, partial foot amputation, patellar tendon bearing socket, peripheral neuropathy, Polycentric knee, Power Knee, priority journal, Proprio foot, review, Rheo leg, sensory feedback, Single-axis knee, skin abrasion, synovial bursa, total surface bearing socket, treatment indication},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Chitragari2014,

title = {Prosthetic options available for the diabetic lower limb amputee},

author = {G. Chitragari and D. B. Mahler and B. J. Sumpio and P. A. Blume and B. E. Sumpio},

url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L370343216&from=export},

doi = {10.1016/j.cpm.2013.09.008},

issn = {1558-2302},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

journal = {Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg.},

volume = {31},

number = {1},

pages = {174–185},

address = {B.E. Sumpio, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, BB 204, New Haven, CT 06520-8062, United States},

abstract = {Although the rate of lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes is decreasing, amputation still remains a major complication of diabetes. Prosthetics have been long used to help amputees ambulate. The last decade has seen many advances in prostheses with the enhanced understanding of the mechanics of ambulation and improved use of technology. This review describes the different types of prosthetic options available for below knee, ankle, and foot amputees, emphasizing the latest advances in prosthetic design. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.},

keywords = {ankle prosthesis, below knee prosthesis, C-leg, dermatitis, diabetes mellitus, diabetic patient, fluid control knee, gait, human, Hydraulic knee, iWALK, joint stability, knee function, leg amputation, leg prosthesis, Manual locking Knee, microprocessor knee, mobilization, partial foot amputation, patellar tendon bearing socket, peripheral neuropathy, Polycentric knee, Power Knee, priority journal, Proprio foot, review, Rheo leg, sensory feedback, Single-axis knee, skin abrasion, synovial bursa, total surface bearing socket, treatment indication},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}