TPress
1.
Houdijk, H.; Wezenberg, D.; Hak, L.; Cutti, A. G.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 15, 2018, ISSN: 1743-0003.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, article, biomechanics, controlled study, energy storing and return prosthetic feet, gait, human, kinematics, leg amputation, leg prosthesis, male, mobilization, priority journal, solid ankle cushioned heel feet, step length, walking speed
@article{Houdijk2018,
title = {Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation},
author = {H. Houdijk and D. Wezenberg and L. Hak and A. G. Cutti},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623754871&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-018-0404-9},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {15},
address = {H. Houdijk, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands},
abstract = {Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) feet are generally preferred over solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) feet by people with a lower limb amputation. While ESAR feet have been shown to have only limited effect on gait economy, other functional benefits should account for this preference. A simple biomechanical model suggests that enhanced gait stability and gait symmetry could prove to explain part of the difference in the subjective preference between both feet. Aim: To investigate whether increased push-off power with ESAR feet increases center of mass velocity at push off and enhance intact step length and step length symmetry while preserving the margin of stability during walking in people with a transtibial prosthesis. Methods: Fifteen people with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked with their prescribed ESAR foot and a SACH foot at a fixed walking speed (1.2 m/s) over a level walkway while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Push-off work generated by the foot, center of mass velocity, step length, step length symmetry and backward margin of stability were assessed and compared between feet. Results: Push-off work was significantly higher when using the ESAR foot compared to the SACH foot. Simultaneously, center of mass velocity at toe-off was higher with ESAR compared to SACH, and intact step length and step length symmetry increased without reducing the backward margin of stability. Conclusion: Compared to the SACH foot, the ESAR foot allowed an improvement of step length symmetry while preserving the backward margin of stability at community ambulation speed. These benefits may possibly contribute to the subjective preference for ESAR feet in people with a lower limb amputation.},
keywords = {adult, article, biomechanics, controlled study, energy storing and return prosthetic feet, gait, human, kinematics, leg amputation, leg prosthesis, male, mobilization, priority journal, solid ankle cushioned heel feet, step length, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) feet are generally preferred over solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) feet by people with a lower limb amputation. While ESAR feet have been shown to have only limited effect on gait economy, other functional benefits should account for this preference. A simple biomechanical model suggests that enhanced gait stability and gait symmetry could prove to explain part of the difference in the subjective preference between both feet. Aim: To investigate whether increased push-off power with ESAR feet increases center of mass velocity at push off and enhance intact step length and step length symmetry while preserving the margin of stability during walking in people with a transtibial prosthesis. Methods: Fifteen people with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked with their prescribed ESAR foot and a SACH foot at a fixed walking speed (1.2 m/s) over a level walkway while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Push-off work generated by the foot, center of mass velocity, step length, step length symmetry and backward margin of stability were assessed and compared between feet. Results: Push-off work was significantly higher when using the ESAR foot compared to the SACH foot. Simultaneously, center of mass velocity at toe-off was higher with ESAR compared to SACH, and intact step length and step length symmetry increased without reducing the backward margin of stability. Conclusion: Compared to the SACH foot, the ESAR foot allowed an improvement of step length symmetry while preserving the backward margin of stability at community ambulation speed. These benefits may possibly contribute to the subjective preference for ESAR feet in people with a lower limb amputation.
2018
Houdijk, H.; Wezenberg, D.; Hak, L.; Cutti, A. G.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 15, 2018, ISSN: 1743-0003.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, article, biomechanics, controlled study, energy storing and return prosthetic feet, gait, human, kinematics, leg amputation, leg prosthesis, male, mobilization, priority journal, solid ankle cushioned heel feet, step length, walking speed
@article{Houdijk2018,
title = {Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation},
author = {H. Houdijk and D. Wezenberg and L. Hak and A. G. Cutti},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623754871&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-018-0404-9},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {15},
address = {H. Houdijk, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands},
abstract = {Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) feet are generally preferred over solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) feet by people with a lower limb amputation. While ESAR feet have been shown to have only limited effect on gait economy, other functional benefits should account for this preference. A simple biomechanical model suggests that enhanced gait stability and gait symmetry could prove to explain part of the difference in the subjective preference between both feet. Aim: To investigate whether increased push-off power with ESAR feet increases center of mass velocity at push off and enhance intact step length and step length symmetry while preserving the margin of stability during walking in people with a transtibial prosthesis. Methods: Fifteen people with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked with their prescribed ESAR foot and a SACH foot at a fixed walking speed (1.2 m/s) over a level walkway while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Push-off work generated by the foot, center of mass velocity, step length, step length symmetry and backward margin of stability were assessed and compared between feet. Results: Push-off work was significantly higher when using the ESAR foot compared to the SACH foot. Simultaneously, center of mass velocity at toe-off was higher with ESAR compared to SACH, and intact step length and step length symmetry increased without reducing the backward margin of stability. Conclusion: Compared to the SACH foot, the ESAR foot allowed an improvement of step length symmetry while preserving the backward margin of stability at community ambulation speed. These benefits may possibly contribute to the subjective preference for ESAR feet in people with a lower limb amputation.},
keywords = {adult, article, biomechanics, controlled study, energy storing and return prosthetic feet, gait, human, kinematics, leg amputation, leg prosthesis, male, mobilization, priority journal, solid ankle cushioned heel feet, step length, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) feet are generally preferred over solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) feet by people with a lower limb amputation. While ESAR feet have been shown to have only limited effect on gait economy, other functional benefits should account for this preference. A simple biomechanical model suggests that enhanced gait stability and gait symmetry could prove to explain part of the difference in the subjective preference between both feet. Aim: To investigate whether increased push-off power with ESAR feet increases center of mass velocity at push off and enhance intact step length and step length symmetry while preserving the margin of stability during walking in people with a transtibial prosthesis. Methods: Fifteen people with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked with their prescribed ESAR foot and a SACH foot at a fixed walking speed (1.2 m/s) over a level walkway while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Push-off work generated by the foot, center of mass velocity, step length, step length symmetry and backward margin of stability were assessed and compared between feet. Results: Push-off work was significantly higher when using the ESAR foot compared to the SACH foot. Simultaneously, center of mass velocity at toe-off was higher with ESAR compared to SACH, and intact step length and step length symmetry increased without reducing the backward margin of stability. Conclusion: Compared to the SACH foot, the ESAR foot allowed an improvement of step length symmetry while preserving the backward margin of stability at community ambulation speed. These benefits may possibly contribute to the subjective preference for ESAR feet in people with a lower limb amputation.
2018
Houdijk, H.; Wezenberg, D.; Hak, L.; Cutti, A. G.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 15, 2018, ISSN: 1743-0003.
@article{Houdijk2018,
title = {Energy storing and return prosthetic feet improve step length symmetry while preserving margins of stability in persons with transtibial amputation},
author = {H. Houdijk and D. Wezenberg and L. Hak and A. G. Cutti},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L623754871&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-018-0404-9},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {15},
address = {H. Houdijk, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands},
abstract = {Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) feet are generally preferred over solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) feet by people with a lower limb amputation. While ESAR feet have been shown to have only limited effect on gait economy, other functional benefits should account for this preference. A simple biomechanical model suggests that enhanced gait stability and gait symmetry could prove to explain part of the difference in the subjective preference between both feet. Aim: To investigate whether increased push-off power with ESAR feet increases center of mass velocity at push off and enhance intact step length and step length symmetry while preserving the margin of stability during walking in people with a transtibial prosthesis. Methods: Fifteen people with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked with their prescribed ESAR foot and a SACH foot at a fixed walking speed (1.2 m/s) over a level walkway while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Push-off work generated by the foot, center of mass velocity, step length, step length symmetry and backward margin of stability were assessed and compared between feet. Results: Push-off work was significantly higher when using the ESAR foot compared to the SACH foot. Simultaneously, center of mass velocity at toe-off was higher with ESAR compared to SACH, and intact step length and step length symmetry increased without reducing the backward margin of stability. Conclusion: Compared to the SACH foot, the ESAR foot allowed an improvement of step length symmetry while preserving the backward margin of stability at community ambulation speed. These benefits may possibly contribute to the subjective preference for ESAR feet in people with a lower limb amputation.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Energy storing and return (ESAR) feet are generally preferred over solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) feet by people with a lower limb amputation. While ESAR feet have been shown to have only limited effect on gait economy, other functional benefits should account for this preference. A simple biomechanical model suggests that enhanced gait stability and gait symmetry could prove to explain part of the difference in the subjective preference between both feet. Aim: To investigate whether increased push-off power with ESAR feet increases center of mass velocity at push off and enhance intact step length and step length symmetry while preserving the margin of stability during walking in people with a transtibial prosthesis. Methods: Fifteen people with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked with their prescribed ESAR foot and a SACH foot at a fixed walking speed (1.2 m/s) over a level walkway while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Push-off work generated by the foot, center of mass velocity, step length, step length symmetry and backward margin of stability were assessed and compared between feet. Results: Push-off work was significantly higher when using the ESAR foot compared to the SACH foot. Simultaneously, center of mass velocity at toe-off was higher with ESAR compared to SACH, and intact step length and step length symmetry increased without reducing the backward margin of stability. Conclusion: Compared to the SACH foot, the ESAR foot allowed an improvement of step length symmetry while preserving the backward margin of stability at community ambulation speed. These benefits may possibly contribute to the subjective preference for ESAR feet in people with a lower limb amputation.