TPress
1.
Trinler, U.; Heitzmann, D. W. W.; Hitzeroth, S.; Alimusaj, M.; Rehg, M.; Hogan, A.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 47, Nr. 1, S. 94–100, 2023, ISSN: 0309-3646.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, amputation, article, biomechanics, carbon fiber, clinical article, cohort analysis, ComfyStep, female, foot prosthesis, ground reaction force, human, kinematics, kinetics, knee function, L.A.S.A.R. Posture device, male, medical device, post hoc analysis, prospective study, range of motion, statistical analysis, three dimensional printing, transtibial amputation
@article{Trinler2023,
title = {Biomechanical comparison of a 3D-printed prosthetic foot with conventional feet in people with transtibial amputation: A prospective cohort study},
author = {U. Trinler and D. W. W. Heitzmann and S. Hitzeroth and M. Alimusaj and M. Rehg and A. Hogan},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2022874959&from=export},
doi = {10.1097/PXR.0000000000000180},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-08-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {47},
number = {1},
pages = {94–100},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
address = {U. Trinler, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, Ludwigshafen, Germany},
abstract = {Introduction: The method of 3D printing is increasingly gaining utilization in clinical applications and may support prosthetic fitting. The aim was to compare biomechanical outcomes of people with a transtibial amputation using a novel, individualizable, 3D-printed prosthetic foot (ComfyStep, Mecuris) with two conventional, widely used prosthetic feet during level ground walking using a 3D motion analysis system. Methods: Ten individuals with an unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with 3 prosthetic feet (ComfyStep, Assure/Össur, DynamicMotion/Ottobock) using their current, well-fitting socket. They had at least 1 week of familiarization for each foot before gait analyses were conducted. Kinematics and kinetics as well as roll over shape (ROS) length and radius were calculated and compared between feet. Results: The sound side gait parameters of the participants were comparable when using different feet. However, there were differences on the affected side. The statistical analysis revealed that the 3D-printed foot differed significantly compared with the conventional feet in the following aspects: reduced range of motion, increased plantar flexion moment, reduced plantar flexion power, larger ROS radius, less favorable energy ratio, and higher overall stiffness. Conclusion: In principle, 3D-printed feet have advantages over conventional “off the shelf” feet, as their biomechanical characteristics could be adjusted more in detail according to the patient needs. Although, differences between conventional feet and the ComfyStep were shown. Whether these differences have a negative clinically relevant effect remains unclear. However, results suggest that commercially available 3D-printed feet should incorporate systematically better adjustments, for example, for stiffness, to enhance prosthetic performance.},
keywords = {adult, amputation, article, biomechanics, carbon fiber, clinical article, cohort analysis, ComfyStep, female, foot prosthesis, ground reaction force, human, kinematics, kinetics, knee function, L.A.S.A.R. Posture device, male, medical device, post hoc analysis, prospective study, range of motion, statistical analysis, three dimensional printing, transtibial amputation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: The method of 3D printing is increasingly gaining utilization in clinical applications and may support prosthetic fitting. The aim was to compare biomechanical outcomes of people with a transtibial amputation using a novel, individualizable, 3D-printed prosthetic foot (ComfyStep, Mecuris) with two conventional, widely used prosthetic feet during level ground walking using a 3D motion analysis system. Methods: Ten individuals with an unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with 3 prosthetic feet (ComfyStep, Assure/Össur, DynamicMotion/Ottobock) using their current, well-fitting socket. They had at least 1 week of familiarization for each foot before gait analyses were conducted. Kinematics and kinetics as well as roll over shape (ROS) length and radius were calculated and compared between feet. Results: The sound side gait parameters of the participants were comparable when using different feet. However, there were differences on the affected side. The statistical analysis revealed that the 3D-printed foot differed significantly compared with the conventional feet in the following aspects: reduced range of motion, increased plantar flexion moment, reduced plantar flexion power, larger ROS radius, less favorable energy ratio, and higher overall stiffness. Conclusion: In principle, 3D-printed feet have advantages over conventional “off the shelf” feet, as their biomechanical characteristics could be adjusted more in detail according to the patient needs. Although, differences between conventional feet and the ComfyStep were shown. Whether these differences have a negative clinically relevant effect remains unclear. However, results suggest that commercially available 3D-printed feet should incorporate systematically better adjustments, for example, for stiffness, to enhance prosthetic performance.
2.
Darter, B. J.; Syrett, E. D.; Foreman, K. B.; Kubiak, E.; Sinclair, S.
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 18, Nr. 2 February, 2023, ISSN: 1932-6203.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, amputation, article, Axtion, biomechanics, bone plate, cane, clinical article, frontal plane, gait, hip, hip adduction angle, hip angle, human, kinematics, limb prosthesis, male, middle aged, motion analysis system, Ossur Rheo, Ottobock C-Leg, Ottobock Genium, Ottobock X3, pelvic angle, pelvis lab angle, Pro-Flex Pivo, prosthesis implantation, radiographic parameter, Renegade XL, Rush Low Profile, Rush Renegade, software agent, torque, Triton, Triton Low Profile, trunk, trunk flexion angle, trunk lab angle, trunk pelvis angle, tyloxapol, unilateral transfemoral amputation, walker, walking speed, Wave Sport
@article{Darter2023,
title = {Changes in frontal plane kinematics over 12-months in individuals with the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP)},
author = {B. J. Darter and E. D. Syrett and K. B. Foreman and E. Kubiak and S. Sinclair},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2023020092&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0281339},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {18},
number = {2 February},
address = {B.J. Darter, Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States},
abstract = {Background A bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) eliminates the need for a conventional socket by attaching a prosthesis directly to the user's skeleton. Currently, limited research addresses changes in gait mechanics post BAP implantation. Objective Examine changes in frontal plane movement patterns after BAP implantation. Methods Participants were individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) enrolled in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Early Feasibility Study examining the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP). The participants completed overground gait assessments using their conventional socket and at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, and 12- months following POP implantation. Statistical parameter mapping techniques were used in examining changes in frontal plane kinematics over the 12-months and differences with reference values for individuals without limb loss. Results Statistically significant deviations were found pre-implantation compared to reference values for hip and trunk angles during prosthetic limb stance phase, and for pelvis and trunk relative to the pelvis angles during prosthetic limb swing. At 6-weeks post-implantation, only the trunk angle demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the percent of gait cycle with deviations relative to reference values. At 12-months post-implantation, results revealed frontal plane movements were no longer statistically different across the gait cycle for the trunk angle compared to reference values, and less of the gait cycle was statistically different compared to reference values for all other frontal plane patterns analyzed. No statistically significant within-participant differences were found for frontal plane movement patterns between pre-implantation and 6-weeks or 12-months post-implantation. Conclusions Deviations from reference values displayed prior to device implantation were reduced or eliminated 12-months post-implantation in all frontal plane patterns analyzed, while withinparticipant changes over the 12-month period did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the results suggest the transition to a BAP aided in normalizing gait patterns in a sample of relatively high functioning individuals with TFA.},
keywords = {adult, amputation, article, Axtion, biomechanics, bone plate, cane, clinical article, frontal plane, gait, hip, hip adduction angle, hip angle, human, kinematics, limb prosthesis, male, middle aged, motion analysis system, Ossur Rheo, Ottobock C-Leg, Ottobock Genium, Ottobock X3, pelvic angle, pelvis lab angle, Pro-Flex Pivo, prosthesis implantation, radiographic parameter, Renegade XL, Rush Low Profile, Rush Renegade, software agent, torque, Triton, Triton Low Profile, trunk, trunk flexion angle, trunk lab angle, trunk pelvis angle, tyloxapol, unilateral transfemoral amputation, walker, walking speed, Wave Sport},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background A bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) eliminates the need for a conventional socket by attaching a prosthesis directly to the user's skeleton. Currently, limited research addresses changes in gait mechanics post BAP implantation. Objective Examine changes in frontal plane movement patterns after BAP implantation. Methods Participants were individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) enrolled in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Early Feasibility Study examining the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP). The participants completed overground gait assessments using their conventional socket and at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, and 12- months following POP implantation. Statistical parameter mapping techniques were used in examining changes in frontal plane kinematics over the 12-months and differences with reference values for individuals without limb loss. Results Statistically significant deviations were found pre-implantation compared to reference values for hip and trunk angles during prosthetic limb stance phase, and for pelvis and trunk relative to the pelvis angles during prosthetic limb swing. At 6-weeks post-implantation, only the trunk angle demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the percent of gait cycle with deviations relative to reference values. At 12-months post-implantation, results revealed frontal plane movements were no longer statistically different across the gait cycle for the trunk angle compared to reference values, and less of the gait cycle was statistically different compared to reference values for all other frontal plane patterns analyzed. No statistically significant within-participant differences were found for frontal plane movement patterns between pre-implantation and 6-weeks or 12-months post-implantation. Conclusions Deviations from reference values displayed prior to device implantation were reduced or eliminated 12-months post-implantation in all frontal plane patterns analyzed, while withinparticipant changes over the 12-month period did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the results suggest the transition to a BAP aided in normalizing gait patterns in a sample of relatively high functioning individuals with TFA.
3.
Pröbsting, E.; Altenburg, B.; Bellmann, M.; Krug, K.; Schmalz, T.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 46, Nr. 4, S. 306–313, 2022, ISSN: 0309-3646.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adduction, adult, amputation, ankle, article, C Leg 4, camera, carbon fiber, clinical article, foot prosthesis, forefoot, human, knee, knee function, lower limb, male, microprocessor, retrospective study, sensor, walking, walking speed
@article{Proebsting2022,
title = {How does ankle power on the prosthetic side influence loading parameters on the sound side during level walking of persons with transfemoral amputation?},
author = {E. Pröbsting and B. Altenburg and M. Bellmann and K. Krug and T. Schmalz},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2019708323&from=export},
doi = {10.1097/pxr.0000000000000099},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {46},
number = {4},
pages = {306–313},
address = {E. Pröbsting, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Herrmann-Rein-Straße 2a, Göttingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background:Increased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.Objective:To analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters.Study design:Interventional cross sectional study.Methods:Level walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.Results:The ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.Conclusions:The additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.},
keywords = {adduction, adult, amputation, ankle, article, C Leg 4, camera, carbon fiber, clinical article, foot prosthesis, forefoot, human, knee, knee function, lower limb, male, microprocessor, retrospective study, sensor, walking, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background:Increased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.Objective:To analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters.Study design:Interventional cross sectional study.Methods:Level walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.Results:The ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.Conclusions:The additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.
4.
Beck, O. N.; Taboga, P.; Grabowski, A. M.
Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses Artikel
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 11, Nr. 12, 2016, ISSN: 1932-6203.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: 1E90 Sprinter, adult, amputation, article, athlete, body mass, Catapult FX6, Cheetah Xtend, clinical article, controlled study, female, Flex-Run, foot prosthesis, human, hysteresis, male, materials testing, mechanics, prosthesis design, prosthesis material, prosthetic force displacement, prosthetic height, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, Sprinter, transtibial amputation
@article{Beck2016,
title = {Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses},
author = {O. N. Beck and P. Taboga and A. M. Grabowski},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L613668924&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0168298},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {11},
number = {12},
abstract = {The mechanical stiffness of running-specific prostheses likely affects the functional abilities of athletes with leg amputations. However, each prosthetic manufacturer recommends prostheses based on subjective stiffness categories rather than performance based metrics. The actual mechanical stiffness values of running-specific prostheses (i.e. kN/m) are unknown. Consequently, we sought to characterize and disseminate the stiffness values of running-specific prostheses so that researchers, clinicians, and athletes can objectively evaluate prosthetic function. We characterized the stiffness values of 55 running-specific prostheses across various models, stiffness categories, and heights using forces and angles representative of those measured from athletes with transtibial amputations during running. Characterizing prosthetic force-displacement profiles with a 2nd degree polynomial explained 4.4% more of the variance than a linear function (p<0.001). The prosthetic stiffness values of manufacturer recommended stiffness categories varied between prosthetic models (p<0.001). Also, prosthetic stiffness was 10% to 39% less at angles typical of running 3 m/s and 6 m/s (10?-25?) compared to neutral (0?) (p<0.001). Furthermore, prosthetic stiffness was inversely related to height in J-shaped (p<0.001), but not C-shaped, prostheses. Running-specific prostheses should be tested under the demands of the respective activity in order to derive relevant characterizations of stiffness and function. In all, our results indicate that when athletes with leg amputations alter prosthetic model, height, and/ or sagittal plane alignment, their prosthetic stiffness profiles also change; therefore variations in comfort, performance, etc. may be indirectly due to altered stiffness.},
keywords = {1E90 Sprinter, adult, amputation, article, athlete, body mass, Catapult FX6, Cheetah Xtend, clinical article, controlled study, female, Flex-Run, foot prosthesis, human, hysteresis, male, materials testing, mechanics, prosthesis design, prosthesis material, prosthetic force displacement, prosthetic height, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, Sprinter, transtibial amputation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The mechanical stiffness of running-specific prostheses likely affects the functional abilities of athletes with leg amputations. However, each prosthetic manufacturer recommends prostheses based on subjective stiffness categories rather than performance based metrics. The actual mechanical stiffness values of running-specific prostheses (i.e. kN/m) are unknown. Consequently, we sought to characterize and disseminate the stiffness values of running-specific prostheses so that researchers, clinicians, and athletes can objectively evaluate prosthetic function. We characterized the stiffness values of 55 running-specific prostheses across various models, stiffness categories, and heights using forces and angles representative of those measured from athletes with transtibial amputations during running. Characterizing prosthetic force-displacement profiles with a 2nd degree polynomial explained 4.4% more of the variance than a linear function (p<0.001). The prosthetic stiffness values of manufacturer recommended stiffness categories varied between prosthetic models (p<0.001). Also, prosthetic stiffness was 10% to 39% less at angles typical of running 3 m/s and 6 m/s (10?-25?) compared to neutral (0?) (p<0.001). Furthermore, prosthetic stiffness was inversely related to height in J-shaped (p<0.001), but not C-shaped, prostheses. Running-specific prostheses should be tested under the demands of the respective activity in order to derive relevant characterizations of stiffness and function. In all, our results indicate that when athletes with leg amputations alter prosthetic model, height, and/ or sagittal plane alignment, their prosthetic stiffness profiles also change; therefore variations in comfort, performance, etc. may be indirectly due to altered stiffness.
5.
Whitehead, J. M. Aldridge; Wolf, E. J.; Scoville, C. R.; Wilken, J. M.
In: Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., Bd. 472, Nr. 10, S. 3093–3101, 2014, ISSN: 0009-921X.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: above knee prosthesis, adult, amputation, article, C- Leg, clinical article, controlled study, femur, functional assessment, ground reaction force, human, joint function, kinematics, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee, motion analysis system, priority journal, Total Knee, walking, X2
@article{AldridgeWhitehead2014,
title = {Does a Microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Knee Affect Stair Ascent Strategies in Persons With Transfemoral Amputation?},
author = {J. M. Aldridge Whitehead and E. J. Wolf and C. R. Scoville and J. M. Wilken},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L608263443&from=export},
doi = {10.1007/s11999-014-3484-2},
issn = {0009-921X},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-10-01},
journal = {Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.},
volume = {472},
number = {10},
pages = {3093–3101},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
address = {J.M. Wilken, DOD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Center for the Intrepid, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Ft Sam Houston, TX, United States},
abstract = {Background: Stair ascent can be difficult for individuals with transfemoral amputation because of the loss of knee function. Most individuals with transfemoral amputation use either a step-to-step (nonreciprocal, advancing one stair at a time) or skip-step strategy (nonreciprocal, advancing two stairs at a time), rather than a step-over-step (reciprocal) strategy, because step-to-step and skip-step allow the leading intact limb to do the majority of work. A new microprocessor-controlled knee (Ottobock X2®) uses flexion/extension resistance to allow step-over-step stair ascent. Questions/Purposes: We compared self-selected stair ascent strategies between conventional and X2® prosthetic knees, examined between-limb differences, and differentiated stair ascent mechanics between X2® users and individuals without amputation. We also determined which factors are associated with differences in knee position during initial contact and swing within X2® users. Methods: Fourteen individuals with transfemoral amputation participated in stair ascent sessions while using conventional and X2® knees. Ten individuals without amputation also completed a stair ascent session. Lower-extremity stair ascent joint angles, moment, and powers and ground reaction forces were calculated using inverse dynamics during self-selected strategy and cadence and controlled cadence using a step-over-step strategy. Results: One individual with amputation self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using a conventional knee, while 10 individuals self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using X2® knees. Individuals with amputation used greater prosthetic knee flexion during initial contact (32.5°},
keywords = {above knee prosthesis, adult, amputation, article, C- Leg, clinical article, controlled study, femur, functional assessment, ground reaction force, human, joint function, kinematics, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee, motion analysis system, priority journal, Total Knee, walking, X2},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Stair ascent can be difficult for individuals with transfemoral amputation because of the loss of knee function. Most individuals with transfemoral amputation use either a step-to-step (nonreciprocal, advancing one stair at a time) or skip-step strategy (nonreciprocal, advancing two stairs at a time), rather than a step-over-step (reciprocal) strategy, because step-to-step and skip-step allow the leading intact limb to do the majority of work. A new microprocessor-controlled knee (Ottobock X2®) uses flexion/extension resistance to allow step-over-step stair ascent. Questions/Purposes: We compared self-selected stair ascent strategies between conventional and X2® prosthetic knees, examined between-limb differences, and differentiated stair ascent mechanics between X2® users and individuals without amputation. We also determined which factors are associated with differences in knee position during initial contact and swing within X2® users. Methods: Fourteen individuals with transfemoral amputation participated in stair ascent sessions while using conventional and X2® knees. Ten individuals without amputation also completed a stair ascent session. Lower-extremity stair ascent joint angles, moment, and powers and ground reaction forces were calculated using inverse dynamics during self-selected strategy and cadence and controlled cadence using a step-over-step strategy. Results: One individual with amputation self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using a conventional knee, while 10 individuals self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using X2® knees. Individuals with amputation used greater prosthetic knee flexion during initial contact (32.5°
2023
Trinler, U.; Heitzmann, D. W. W.; Hitzeroth, S.; Alimusaj, M.; Rehg, M.; Hogan, A.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 47, Nr. 1, S. 94–100, 2023, ISSN: 0309-3646.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, amputation, article, biomechanics, carbon fiber, clinical article, cohort analysis, ComfyStep, female, foot prosthesis, ground reaction force, human, kinematics, kinetics, knee function, L.A.S.A.R. Posture device, male, medical device, post hoc analysis, prospective study, range of motion, statistical analysis, three dimensional printing, transtibial amputation
@article{Trinler2023,
title = {Biomechanical comparison of a 3D-printed prosthetic foot with conventional feet in people with transtibial amputation: A prospective cohort study},
author = {U. Trinler and D. W. W. Heitzmann and S. Hitzeroth and M. Alimusaj and M. Rehg and A. Hogan},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2022874959&from=export},
doi = {10.1097/PXR.0000000000000180},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-08-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {47},
number = {1},
pages = {94–100},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
address = {U. Trinler, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, Ludwigshafen, Germany},
abstract = {Introduction: The method of 3D printing is increasingly gaining utilization in clinical applications and may support prosthetic fitting. The aim was to compare biomechanical outcomes of people with a transtibial amputation using a novel, individualizable, 3D-printed prosthetic foot (ComfyStep, Mecuris) with two conventional, widely used prosthetic feet during level ground walking using a 3D motion analysis system. Methods: Ten individuals with an unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with 3 prosthetic feet (ComfyStep, Assure/Össur, DynamicMotion/Ottobock) using their current, well-fitting socket. They had at least 1 week of familiarization for each foot before gait analyses were conducted. Kinematics and kinetics as well as roll over shape (ROS) length and radius were calculated and compared between feet. Results: The sound side gait parameters of the participants were comparable when using different feet. However, there were differences on the affected side. The statistical analysis revealed that the 3D-printed foot differed significantly compared with the conventional feet in the following aspects: reduced range of motion, increased plantar flexion moment, reduced plantar flexion power, larger ROS radius, less favorable energy ratio, and higher overall stiffness. Conclusion: In principle, 3D-printed feet have advantages over conventional “off the shelf” feet, as their biomechanical characteristics could be adjusted more in detail according to the patient needs. Although, differences between conventional feet and the ComfyStep were shown. Whether these differences have a negative clinically relevant effect remains unclear. However, results suggest that commercially available 3D-printed feet should incorporate systematically better adjustments, for example, for stiffness, to enhance prosthetic performance.},
keywords = {adult, amputation, article, biomechanics, carbon fiber, clinical article, cohort analysis, ComfyStep, female, foot prosthesis, ground reaction force, human, kinematics, kinetics, knee function, L.A.S.A.R. Posture device, male, medical device, post hoc analysis, prospective study, range of motion, statistical analysis, three dimensional printing, transtibial amputation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: The method of 3D printing is increasingly gaining utilization in clinical applications and may support prosthetic fitting. The aim was to compare biomechanical outcomes of people with a transtibial amputation using a novel, individualizable, 3D-printed prosthetic foot (ComfyStep, Mecuris) with two conventional, widely used prosthetic feet during level ground walking using a 3D motion analysis system. Methods: Ten individuals with an unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with 3 prosthetic feet (ComfyStep, Assure/Össur, DynamicMotion/Ottobock) using their current, well-fitting socket. They had at least 1 week of familiarization for each foot before gait analyses were conducted. Kinematics and kinetics as well as roll over shape (ROS) length and radius were calculated and compared between feet. Results: The sound side gait parameters of the participants were comparable when using different feet. However, there were differences on the affected side. The statistical analysis revealed that the 3D-printed foot differed significantly compared with the conventional feet in the following aspects: reduced range of motion, increased plantar flexion moment, reduced plantar flexion power, larger ROS radius, less favorable energy ratio, and higher overall stiffness. Conclusion: In principle, 3D-printed feet have advantages over conventional “off the shelf” feet, as their biomechanical characteristics could be adjusted more in detail according to the patient needs. Although, differences between conventional feet and the ComfyStep were shown. Whether these differences have a negative clinically relevant effect remains unclear. However, results suggest that commercially available 3D-printed feet should incorporate systematically better adjustments, for example, for stiffness, to enhance prosthetic performance.
Darter, B. J.; Syrett, E. D.; Foreman, K. B.; Kubiak, E.; Sinclair, S.
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 18, Nr. 2 February, 2023, ISSN: 1932-6203.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, amputation, article, Axtion, biomechanics, bone plate, cane, clinical article, frontal plane, gait, hip, hip adduction angle, hip angle, human, kinematics, limb prosthesis, male, middle aged, motion analysis system, Ossur Rheo, Ottobock C-Leg, Ottobock Genium, Ottobock X3, pelvic angle, pelvis lab angle, Pro-Flex Pivo, prosthesis implantation, radiographic parameter, Renegade XL, Rush Low Profile, Rush Renegade, software agent, torque, Triton, Triton Low Profile, trunk, trunk flexion angle, trunk lab angle, trunk pelvis angle, tyloxapol, unilateral transfemoral amputation, walker, walking speed, Wave Sport
@article{Darter2023,
title = {Changes in frontal plane kinematics over 12-months in individuals with the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP)},
author = {B. J. Darter and E. D. Syrett and K. B. Foreman and E. Kubiak and S. Sinclair},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2023020092&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0281339},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {18},
number = {2 February},
address = {B.J. Darter, Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States},
abstract = {Background A bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) eliminates the need for a conventional socket by attaching a prosthesis directly to the user's skeleton. Currently, limited research addresses changes in gait mechanics post BAP implantation. Objective Examine changes in frontal plane movement patterns after BAP implantation. Methods Participants were individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) enrolled in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Early Feasibility Study examining the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP). The participants completed overground gait assessments using their conventional socket and at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, and 12- months following POP implantation. Statistical parameter mapping techniques were used in examining changes in frontal plane kinematics over the 12-months and differences with reference values for individuals without limb loss. Results Statistically significant deviations were found pre-implantation compared to reference values for hip and trunk angles during prosthetic limb stance phase, and for pelvis and trunk relative to the pelvis angles during prosthetic limb swing. At 6-weeks post-implantation, only the trunk angle demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the percent of gait cycle with deviations relative to reference values. At 12-months post-implantation, results revealed frontal plane movements were no longer statistically different across the gait cycle for the trunk angle compared to reference values, and less of the gait cycle was statistically different compared to reference values for all other frontal plane patterns analyzed. No statistically significant within-participant differences were found for frontal plane movement patterns between pre-implantation and 6-weeks or 12-months post-implantation. Conclusions Deviations from reference values displayed prior to device implantation were reduced or eliminated 12-months post-implantation in all frontal plane patterns analyzed, while withinparticipant changes over the 12-month period did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the results suggest the transition to a BAP aided in normalizing gait patterns in a sample of relatively high functioning individuals with TFA.},
keywords = {adult, amputation, article, Axtion, biomechanics, bone plate, cane, clinical article, frontal plane, gait, hip, hip adduction angle, hip angle, human, kinematics, limb prosthesis, male, middle aged, motion analysis system, Ossur Rheo, Ottobock C-Leg, Ottobock Genium, Ottobock X3, pelvic angle, pelvis lab angle, Pro-Flex Pivo, prosthesis implantation, radiographic parameter, Renegade XL, Rush Low Profile, Rush Renegade, software agent, torque, Triton, Triton Low Profile, trunk, trunk flexion angle, trunk lab angle, trunk pelvis angle, tyloxapol, unilateral transfemoral amputation, walker, walking speed, Wave Sport},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background A bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) eliminates the need for a conventional socket by attaching a prosthesis directly to the user's skeleton. Currently, limited research addresses changes in gait mechanics post BAP implantation. Objective Examine changes in frontal plane movement patterns after BAP implantation. Methods Participants were individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) enrolled in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Early Feasibility Study examining the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP). The participants completed overground gait assessments using their conventional socket and at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, and 12- months following POP implantation. Statistical parameter mapping techniques were used in examining changes in frontal plane kinematics over the 12-months and differences with reference values for individuals without limb loss. Results Statistically significant deviations were found pre-implantation compared to reference values for hip and trunk angles during prosthetic limb stance phase, and for pelvis and trunk relative to the pelvis angles during prosthetic limb swing. At 6-weeks post-implantation, only the trunk angle demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the percent of gait cycle with deviations relative to reference values. At 12-months post-implantation, results revealed frontal plane movements were no longer statistically different across the gait cycle for the trunk angle compared to reference values, and less of the gait cycle was statistically different compared to reference values for all other frontal plane patterns analyzed. No statistically significant within-participant differences were found for frontal plane movement patterns between pre-implantation and 6-weeks or 12-months post-implantation. Conclusions Deviations from reference values displayed prior to device implantation were reduced or eliminated 12-months post-implantation in all frontal plane patterns analyzed, while withinparticipant changes over the 12-month period did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the results suggest the transition to a BAP aided in normalizing gait patterns in a sample of relatively high functioning individuals with TFA.
2022
Pröbsting, E.; Altenburg, B.; Bellmann, M.; Krug, K.; Schmalz, T.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 46, Nr. 4, S. 306–313, 2022, ISSN: 0309-3646.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adduction, adult, amputation, ankle, article, C Leg 4, camera, carbon fiber, clinical article, foot prosthesis, forefoot, human, knee, knee function, lower limb, male, microprocessor, retrospective study, sensor, walking, walking speed
@article{Proebsting2022,
title = {How does ankle power on the prosthetic side influence loading parameters on the sound side during level walking of persons with transfemoral amputation?},
author = {E. Pröbsting and B. Altenburg and M. Bellmann and K. Krug and T. Schmalz},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2019708323&from=export},
doi = {10.1097/pxr.0000000000000099},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {46},
number = {4},
pages = {306–313},
address = {E. Pröbsting, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Herrmann-Rein-Straße 2a, Göttingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background:Increased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.Objective:To analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters.Study design:Interventional cross sectional study.Methods:Level walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.Results:The ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.Conclusions:The additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.},
keywords = {adduction, adult, amputation, ankle, article, C Leg 4, camera, carbon fiber, clinical article, foot prosthesis, forefoot, human, knee, knee function, lower limb, male, microprocessor, retrospective study, sensor, walking, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background:Increased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.Objective:To analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters.Study design:Interventional cross sectional study.Methods:Level walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.Results:The ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.Conclusions:The additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.
2016
Beck, O. N.; Taboga, P.; Grabowski, A. M.
Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses Artikel
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 11, Nr. 12, 2016, ISSN: 1932-6203.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: 1E90 Sprinter, adult, amputation, article, athlete, body mass, Catapult FX6, Cheetah Xtend, clinical article, controlled study, female, Flex-Run, foot prosthesis, human, hysteresis, male, materials testing, mechanics, prosthesis design, prosthesis material, prosthetic force displacement, prosthetic height, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, Sprinter, transtibial amputation
@article{Beck2016,
title = {Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses},
author = {O. N. Beck and P. Taboga and A. M. Grabowski},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L613668924&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0168298},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {11},
number = {12},
abstract = {The mechanical stiffness of running-specific prostheses likely affects the functional abilities of athletes with leg amputations. However, each prosthetic manufacturer recommends prostheses based on subjective stiffness categories rather than performance based metrics. The actual mechanical stiffness values of running-specific prostheses (i.e. kN/m) are unknown. Consequently, we sought to characterize and disseminate the stiffness values of running-specific prostheses so that researchers, clinicians, and athletes can objectively evaluate prosthetic function. We characterized the stiffness values of 55 running-specific prostheses across various models, stiffness categories, and heights using forces and angles representative of those measured from athletes with transtibial amputations during running. Characterizing prosthetic force-displacement profiles with a 2nd degree polynomial explained 4.4% more of the variance than a linear function (p<0.001). The prosthetic stiffness values of manufacturer recommended stiffness categories varied between prosthetic models (p<0.001). Also, prosthetic stiffness was 10% to 39% less at angles typical of running 3 m/s and 6 m/s (10?-25?) compared to neutral (0?) (p<0.001). Furthermore, prosthetic stiffness was inversely related to height in J-shaped (p<0.001), but not C-shaped, prostheses. Running-specific prostheses should be tested under the demands of the respective activity in order to derive relevant characterizations of stiffness and function. In all, our results indicate that when athletes with leg amputations alter prosthetic model, height, and/ or sagittal plane alignment, their prosthetic stiffness profiles also change; therefore variations in comfort, performance, etc. may be indirectly due to altered stiffness.},
keywords = {1E90 Sprinter, adult, amputation, article, athlete, body mass, Catapult FX6, Cheetah Xtend, clinical article, controlled study, female, Flex-Run, foot prosthesis, human, hysteresis, male, materials testing, mechanics, prosthesis design, prosthesis material, prosthetic force displacement, prosthetic height, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, Sprinter, transtibial amputation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The mechanical stiffness of running-specific prostheses likely affects the functional abilities of athletes with leg amputations. However, each prosthetic manufacturer recommends prostheses based on subjective stiffness categories rather than performance based metrics. The actual mechanical stiffness values of running-specific prostheses (i.e. kN/m) are unknown. Consequently, we sought to characterize and disseminate the stiffness values of running-specific prostheses so that researchers, clinicians, and athletes can objectively evaluate prosthetic function. We characterized the stiffness values of 55 running-specific prostheses across various models, stiffness categories, and heights using forces and angles representative of those measured from athletes with transtibial amputations during running. Characterizing prosthetic force-displacement profiles with a 2nd degree polynomial explained 4.4% more of the variance than a linear function (p<0.001). The prosthetic stiffness values of manufacturer recommended stiffness categories varied between prosthetic models (p<0.001). Also, prosthetic stiffness was 10% to 39% less at angles typical of running 3 m/s and 6 m/s (10?-25?) compared to neutral (0?) (p<0.001). Furthermore, prosthetic stiffness was inversely related to height in J-shaped (p<0.001), but not C-shaped, prostheses. Running-specific prostheses should be tested under the demands of the respective activity in order to derive relevant characterizations of stiffness and function. In all, our results indicate that when athletes with leg amputations alter prosthetic model, height, and/ or sagittal plane alignment, their prosthetic stiffness profiles also change; therefore variations in comfort, performance, etc. may be indirectly due to altered stiffness.
2014
Whitehead, J. M. Aldridge; Wolf, E. J.; Scoville, C. R.; Wilken, J. M.
In: Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., Bd. 472, Nr. 10, S. 3093–3101, 2014, ISSN: 0009-921X.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: above knee prosthesis, adult, amputation, article, C- Leg, clinical article, controlled study, femur, functional assessment, ground reaction force, human, joint function, kinematics, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee, motion analysis system, priority journal, Total Knee, walking, X2
@article{AldridgeWhitehead2014,
title = {Does a Microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Knee Affect Stair Ascent Strategies in Persons With Transfemoral Amputation?},
author = {J. M. Aldridge Whitehead and E. J. Wolf and C. R. Scoville and J. M. Wilken},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L608263443&from=export},
doi = {10.1007/s11999-014-3484-2},
issn = {0009-921X},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-10-01},
journal = {Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.},
volume = {472},
number = {10},
pages = {3093–3101},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
address = {J.M. Wilken, DOD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Center for the Intrepid, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Ft Sam Houston, TX, United States},
abstract = {Background: Stair ascent can be difficult for individuals with transfemoral amputation because of the loss of knee function. Most individuals with transfemoral amputation use either a step-to-step (nonreciprocal, advancing one stair at a time) or skip-step strategy (nonreciprocal, advancing two stairs at a time), rather than a step-over-step (reciprocal) strategy, because step-to-step and skip-step allow the leading intact limb to do the majority of work. A new microprocessor-controlled knee (Ottobock X2®) uses flexion/extension resistance to allow step-over-step stair ascent. Questions/Purposes: We compared self-selected stair ascent strategies between conventional and X2® prosthetic knees, examined between-limb differences, and differentiated stair ascent mechanics between X2® users and individuals without amputation. We also determined which factors are associated with differences in knee position during initial contact and swing within X2® users. Methods: Fourteen individuals with transfemoral amputation participated in stair ascent sessions while using conventional and X2® knees. Ten individuals without amputation also completed a stair ascent session. Lower-extremity stair ascent joint angles, moment, and powers and ground reaction forces were calculated using inverse dynamics during self-selected strategy and cadence and controlled cadence using a step-over-step strategy. Results: One individual with amputation self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using a conventional knee, while 10 individuals self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using X2® knees. Individuals with amputation used greater prosthetic knee flexion during initial contact (32.5°},
keywords = {above knee prosthesis, adult, amputation, article, C- Leg, clinical article, controlled study, femur, functional assessment, ground reaction force, human, joint function, kinematics, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee, motion analysis system, priority journal, Total Knee, walking, X2},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Stair ascent can be difficult for individuals with transfemoral amputation because of the loss of knee function. Most individuals with transfemoral amputation use either a step-to-step (nonreciprocal, advancing one stair at a time) or skip-step strategy (nonreciprocal, advancing two stairs at a time), rather than a step-over-step (reciprocal) strategy, because step-to-step and skip-step allow the leading intact limb to do the majority of work. A new microprocessor-controlled knee (Ottobock X2®) uses flexion/extension resistance to allow step-over-step stair ascent. Questions/Purposes: We compared self-selected stair ascent strategies between conventional and X2® prosthetic knees, examined between-limb differences, and differentiated stair ascent mechanics between X2® users and individuals without amputation. We also determined which factors are associated with differences in knee position during initial contact and swing within X2® users. Methods: Fourteen individuals with transfemoral amputation participated in stair ascent sessions while using conventional and X2® knees. Ten individuals without amputation also completed a stair ascent session. Lower-extremity stair ascent joint angles, moment, and powers and ground reaction forces were calculated using inverse dynamics during self-selected strategy and cadence and controlled cadence using a step-over-step strategy. Results: One individual with amputation self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using a conventional knee, while 10 individuals self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using X2® knees. Individuals with amputation used greater prosthetic knee flexion during initial contact (32.5°
2023
Trinler, U.; Heitzmann, D. W. W.; Hitzeroth, S.; Alimusaj, M.; Rehg, M.; Hogan, A.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 47, Nr. 1, S. 94–100, 2023, ISSN: 0309-3646.
@article{Trinler2023,
title = {Biomechanical comparison of a 3D-printed prosthetic foot with conventional feet in people with transtibial amputation: A prospective cohort study},
author = {U. Trinler and D. W. W. Heitzmann and S. Hitzeroth and M. Alimusaj and M. Rehg and A. Hogan},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2022874959&from=export},
doi = {10.1097/PXR.0000000000000180},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-08-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {47},
number = {1},
pages = {94–100},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
address = {U. Trinler, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, Ludwigshafen, Germany},
abstract = {Introduction: The method of 3D printing is increasingly gaining utilization in clinical applications and may support prosthetic fitting. The aim was to compare biomechanical outcomes of people with a transtibial amputation using a novel, individualizable, 3D-printed prosthetic foot (ComfyStep, Mecuris) with two conventional, widely used prosthetic feet during level ground walking using a 3D motion analysis system. Methods: Ten individuals with an unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with 3 prosthetic feet (ComfyStep, Assure/Össur, DynamicMotion/Ottobock) using their current, well-fitting socket. They had at least 1 week of familiarization for each foot before gait analyses were conducted. Kinematics and kinetics as well as roll over shape (ROS) length and radius were calculated and compared between feet. Results: The sound side gait parameters of the participants were comparable when using different feet. However, there were differences on the affected side. The statistical analysis revealed that the 3D-printed foot differed significantly compared with the conventional feet in the following aspects: reduced range of motion, increased plantar flexion moment, reduced plantar flexion power, larger ROS radius, less favorable energy ratio, and higher overall stiffness. Conclusion: In principle, 3D-printed feet have advantages over conventional “off the shelf” feet, as their biomechanical characteristics could be adjusted more in detail according to the patient needs. Although, differences between conventional feet and the ComfyStep were shown. Whether these differences have a negative clinically relevant effect remains unclear. However, results suggest that commercially available 3D-printed feet should incorporate systematically better adjustments, for example, for stiffness, to enhance prosthetic performance.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: The method of 3D printing is increasingly gaining utilization in clinical applications and may support prosthetic fitting. The aim was to compare biomechanical outcomes of people with a transtibial amputation using a novel, individualizable, 3D-printed prosthetic foot (ComfyStep, Mecuris) with two conventional, widely used prosthetic feet during level ground walking using a 3D motion analysis system. Methods: Ten individuals with an unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with 3 prosthetic feet (ComfyStep, Assure/Össur, DynamicMotion/Ottobock) using their current, well-fitting socket. They had at least 1 week of familiarization for each foot before gait analyses were conducted. Kinematics and kinetics as well as roll over shape (ROS) length and radius were calculated and compared between feet. Results: The sound side gait parameters of the participants were comparable when using different feet. However, there were differences on the affected side. The statistical analysis revealed that the 3D-printed foot differed significantly compared with the conventional feet in the following aspects: reduced range of motion, increased plantar flexion moment, reduced plantar flexion power, larger ROS radius, less favorable energy ratio, and higher overall stiffness. Conclusion: In principle, 3D-printed feet have advantages over conventional “off the shelf” feet, as their biomechanical characteristics could be adjusted more in detail according to the patient needs. Although, differences between conventional feet and the ComfyStep were shown. Whether these differences have a negative clinically relevant effect remains unclear. However, results suggest that commercially available 3D-printed feet should incorporate systematically better adjustments, for example, for stiffness, to enhance prosthetic performance.
Darter, B. J.; Syrett, E. D.; Foreman, K. B.; Kubiak, E.; Sinclair, S.
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 18, Nr. 2 February, 2023, ISSN: 1932-6203.
@article{Darter2023,
title = {Changes in frontal plane kinematics over 12-months in individuals with the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP)},
author = {B. J. Darter and E. D. Syrett and K. B. Foreman and E. Kubiak and S. Sinclair},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2023020092&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0281339},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {18},
number = {2 February},
address = {B.J. Darter, Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States},
abstract = {Background A bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) eliminates the need for a conventional socket by attaching a prosthesis directly to the user's skeleton. Currently, limited research addresses changes in gait mechanics post BAP implantation. Objective Examine changes in frontal plane movement patterns after BAP implantation. Methods Participants were individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) enrolled in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Early Feasibility Study examining the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP). The participants completed overground gait assessments using their conventional socket and at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, and 12- months following POP implantation. Statistical parameter mapping techniques were used in examining changes in frontal plane kinematics over the 12-months and differences with reference values for individuals without limb loss. Results Statistically significant deviations were found pre-implantation compared to reference values for hip and trunk angles during prosthetic limb stance phase, and for pelvis and trunk relative to the pelvis angles during prosthetic limb swing. At 6-weeks post-implantation, only the trunk angle demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the percent of gait cycle with deviations relative to reference values. At 12-months post-implantation, results revealed frontal plane movements were no longer statistically different across the gait cycle for the trunk angle compared to reference values, and less of the gait cycle was statistically different compared to reference values for all other frontal plane patterns analyzed. No statistically significant within-participant differences were found for frontal plane movement patterns between pre-implantation and 6-weeks or 12-months post-implantation. Conclusions Deviations from reference values displayed prior to device implantation were reduced or eliminated 12-months post-implantation in all frontal plane patterns analyzed, while withinparticipant changes over the 12-month period did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the results suggest the transition to a BAP aided in normalizing gait patterns in a sample of relatively high functioning individuals with TFA.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background A bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) eliminates the need for a conventional socket by attaching a prosthesis directly to the user's skeleton. Currently, limited research addresses changes in gait mechanics post BAP implantation. Objective Examine changes in frontal plane movement patterns after BAP implantation. Methods Participants were individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) enrolled in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Early Feasibility Study examining the Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis (POP). The participants completed overground gait assessments using their conventional socket and at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, 6-months, and 12- months following POP implantation. Statistical parameter mapping techniques were used in examining changes in frontal plane kinematics over the 12-months and differences with reference values for individuals without limb loss. Results Statistically significant deviations were found pre-implantation compared to reference values for hip and trunk angles during prosthetic limb stance phase, and for pelvis and trunk relative to the pelvis angles during prosthetic limb swing. At 6-weeks post-implantation, only the trunk angle demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the percent of gait cycle with deviations relative to reference values. At 12-months post-implantation, results revealed frontal plane movements were no longer statistically different across the gait cycle for the trunk angle compared to reference values, and less of the gait cycle was statistically different compared to reference values for all other frontal plane patterns analyzed. No statistically significant within-participant differences were found for frontal plane movement patterns between pre-implantation and 6-weeks or 12-months post-implantation. Conclusions Deviations from reference values displayed prior to device implantation were reduced or eliminated 12-months post-implantation in all frontal plane patterns analyzed, while withinparticipant changes over the 12-month period did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the results suggest the transition to a BAP aided in normalizing gait patterns in a sample of relatively high functioning individuals with TFA.
2022
Pröbsting, E.; Altenburg, B.; Bellmann, M.; Krug, K.; Schmalz, T.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 46, Nr. 4, S. 306–313, 2022, ISSN: 0309-3646.
@article{Proebsting2022,
title = {How does ankle power on the prosthetic side influence loading parameters on the sound side during level walking of persons with transfemoral amputation?},
author = {E. Pröbsting and B. Altenburg and M. Bellmann and K. Krug and T. Schmalz},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2019708323&from=export},
doi = {10.1097/pxr.0000000000000099},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {46},
number = {4},
pages = {306–313},
address = {E. Pröbsting, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Herrmann-Rein-Straße 2a, Göttingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background:Increased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.Objective:To analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters.Study design:Interventional cross sectional study.Methods:Level walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.Results:The ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.Conclusions:The additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background:Increased ankle power on the prosthetic side seems to decrease biomechanical loading parameters on the sound side. This assumption is based on biomechanical comparisons of different foot constructions. However, such study designs could not show whether the amount of ankle power solely influences the sound side.Objective:To analyze the influence of divergent ankle power, resulting from different foot constructions and from different ankle power settings, on the sound side loading parameters.Study design:Interventional cross sectional study.Methods:Level walking of transfemoral amputees with a microprocessor knee joint and Solid Ankle Cushioned Heel (SACH), energy storing and returning (ESR) and powered foot (PF) was analyzed. The PF was adapted in three configurations: without power (np), low power (lp), and optimal power (op). An optoelectronic camera system with 12 cameras and two force plates were used.Results:The ankle power on the prosthetic side shows significant differences about foot types and different settings of the PF. The knee adduction moment, the knee flexion moment, and the vertical ground reaction forces on the sound side were significantly reduced with PF_op and ESR in comparison to SACH. When analyzing these parameters for the different PF configurations, only some show significant results at normal velocity.Conclusions:The additional positive mechanical work for an active push off in the PF tends to have a relieving effect. The biomechanical sound side loading parameters are reduced with PF_op in comparison to SACH and ESR, resulting in a relief of the sound side of lower limb amputees.
2016
Beck, O. N.; Taboga, P.; Grabowski, A. M.
Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses Artikel
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 11, Nr. 12, 2016, ISSN: 1932-6203.
@article{Beck2016,
title = {Characterizing the mechanical properties of running-specific prostheses},
author = {O. N. Beck and P. Taboga and A. M. Grabowski},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L613668924&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0168298},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {11},
number = {12},
abstract = {The mechanical stiffness of running-specific prostheses likely affects the functional abilities of athletes with leg amputations. However, each prosthetic manufacturer recommends prostheses based on subjective stiffness categories rather than performance based metrics. The actual mechanical stiffness values of running-specific prostheses (i.e. kN/m) are unknown. Consequently, we sought to characterize and disseminate the stiffness values of running-specific prostheses so that researchers, clinicians, and athletes can objectively evaluate prosthetic function. We characterized the stiffness values of 55 running-specific prostheses across various models, stiffness categories, and heights using forces and angles representative of those measured from athletes with transtibial amputations during running. Characterizing prosthetic force-displacement profiles with a 2nd degree polynomial explained 4.4% more of the variance than a linear function (p<0.001). The prosthetic stiffness values of manufacturer recommended stiffness categories varied between prosthetic models (p<0.001). Also, prosthetic stiffness was 10% to 39% less at angles typical of running 3 m/s and 6 m/s (10?-25?) compared to neutral (0?) (p<0.001). Furthermore, prosthetic stiffness was inversely related to height in J-shaped (p<0.001), but not C-shaped, prostheses. Running-specific prostheses should be tested under the demands of the respective activity in order to derive relevant characterizations of stiffness and function. In all, our results indicate that when athletes with leg amputations alter prosthetic model, height, and/ or sagittal plane alignment, their prosthetic stiffness profiles also change; therefore variations in comfort, performance, etc. may be indirectly due to altered stiffness.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The mechanical stiffness of running-specific prostheses likely affects the functional abilities of athletes with leg amputations. However, each prosthetic manufacturer recommends prostheses based on subjective stiffness categories rather than performance based metrics. The actual mechanical stiffness values of running-specific prostheses (i.e. kN/m) are unknown. Consequently, we sought to characterize and disseminate the stiffness values of running-specific prostheses so that researchers, clinicians, and athletes can objectively evaluate prosthetic function. We characterized the stiffness values of 55 running-specific prostheses across various models, stiffness categories, and heights using forces and angles representative of those measured from athletes with transtibial amputations during running. Characterizing prosthetic force-displacement profiles with a 2nd degree polynomial explained 4.4% more of the variance than a linear function (p<0.001). The prosthetic stiffness values of manufacturer recommended stiffness categories varied between prosthetic models (p<0.001). Also, prosthetic stiffness was 10% to 39% less at angles typical of running 3 m/s and 6 m/s (10?-25?) compared to neutral (0?) (p<0.001). Furthermore, prosthetic stiffness was inversely related to height in J-shaped (p<0.001), but not C-shaped, prostheses. Running-specific prostheses should be tested under the demands of the respective activity in order to derive relevant characterizations of stiffness and function. In all, our results indicate that when athletes with leg amputations alter prosthetic model, height, and/ or sagittal plane alignment, their prosthetic stiffness profiles also change; therefore variations in comfort, performance, etc. may be indirectly due to altered stiffness.
2014
Whitehead, J. M. Aldridge; Wolf, E. J.; Scoville, C. R.; Wilken, J. M.
In: Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., Bd. 472, Nr. 10, S. 3093–3101, 2014, ISSN: 0009-921X.
@article{AldridgeWhitehead2014,
title = {Does a Microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Knee Affect Stair Ascent Strategies in Persons With Transfemoral Amputation?},
author = {J. M. Aldridge Whitehead and E. J. Wolf and C. R. Scoville and J. M. Wilken},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L608263443&from=export},
doi = {10.1007/s11999-014-3484-2},
issn = {0009-921X},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-10-01},
journal = {Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.},
volume = {472},
number = {10},
pages = {3093–3101},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
address = {J.M. Wilken, DOD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Center for the Intrepid, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Ft Sam Houston, TX, United States},
abstract = {Background: Stair ascent can be difficult for individuals with transfemoral amputation because of the loss of knee function. Most individuals with transfemoral amputation use either a step-to-step (nonreciprocal, advancing one stair at a time) or skip-step strategy (nonreciprocal, advancing two stairs at a time), rather than a step-over-step (reciprocal) strategy, because step-to-step and skip-step allow the leading intact limb to do the majority of work. A new microprocessor-controlled knee (Ottobock X2®) uses flexion/extension resistance to allow step-over-step stair ascent. Questions/Purposes: We compared self-selected stair ascent strategies between conventional and X2® prosthetic knees, examined between-limb differences, and differentiated stair ascent mechanics between X2® users and individuals without amputation. We also determined which factors are associated with differences in knee position during initial contact and swing within X2® users. Methods: Fourteen individuals with transfemoral amputation participated in stair ascent sessions while using conventional and X2® knees. Ten individuals without amputation also completed a stair ascent session. Lower-extremity stair ascent joint angles, moment, and powers and ground reaction forces were calculated using inverse dynamics during self-selected strategy and cadence and controlled cadence using a step-over-step strategy. Results: One individual with amputation self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using a conventional knee, while 10 individuals self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using X2® knees. Individuals with amputation used greater prosthetic knee flexion during initial contact (32.5°},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Stair ascent can be difficult for individuals with transfemoral amputation because of the loss of knee function. Most individuals with transfemoral amputation use either a step-to-step (nonreciprocal, advancing one stair at a time) or skip-step strategy (nonreciprocal, advancing two stairs at a time), rather than a step-over-step (reciprocal) strategy, because step-to-step and skip-step allow the leading intact limb to do the majority of work. A new microprocessor-controlled knee (Ottobock X2®) uses flexion/extension resistance to allow step-over-step stair ascent. Questions/Purposes: We compared self-selected stair ascent strategies between conventional and X2® prosthetic knees, examined between-limb differences, and differentiated stair ascent mechanics between X2® users and individuals without amputation. We also determined which factors are associated with differences in knee position during initial contact and swing within X2® users. Methods: Fourteen individuals with transfemoral amputation participated in stair ascent sessions while using conventional and X2® knees. Ten individuals without amputation also completed a stair ascent session. Lower-extremity stair ascent joint angles, moment, and powers and ground reaction forces were calculated using inverse dynamics during self-selected strategy and cadence and controlled cadence using a step-over-step strategy. Results: One individual with amputation self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using a conventional knee, while 10 individuals self-selected a step-over-step strategy while using X2® knees. Individuals with amputation used greater prosthetic knee flexion during initial contact (32.5°