TPress
Hausmann, J.; Sweeney-Reed, C. M.; Sobieray, U.; Matzke, M.; Heinze, H. -J.; Voges, J.; Buentjen, L.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 12, Nr. 1, 2015, ISSN: 1743-0003.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: ActiGait, adult, article, case report, cerebrovascular accident, clinical evaluation, fatigue, feasibility study, female, functional electrical stimulation, gait, human, male, middle aged, multiple sclerosis, pain, peroneus nerve, peroneus nerve paralysis, priority journal, quality of life, rehabilitation care, therapy effect, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator, walking speed
@article{Hausmann2015,
title = {Functional electrical stimulation through direct 4-channel nerve stimulation to improve gait in multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study},
author = {J. Hausmann and C. M. Sweeney-Reed and U. Sobieray and M. Matzke and H. -J. Heinze and J. Voges and L. Buentjen},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L606904897&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-015-0096-3},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {12},
number = {1},
address = {J. Hausmann, Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg, Germany},
abstract = {Background: Gait dysfunction due to lower limb central paralysis, frequently involving drop foot, is a common cause of disability in multiple sclerosis and has been treated with transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (FES). We provide here the first report of 4-channel semi-implantable FES of the peroneal nerve which has been successfully used for rehabilitation in patients following stroke. Methods: FES was implemented via a 4-channel semi-implantable closed-loop system (ActiGait®, ©Ottobock), generating dorsiflexion in drop foot. Walking distance, gait symmetry (temporospatial gait analyses, Vicon Motion Systems®), gait velocity (10 m walking test) and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) were measured to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of this system in two patients with progressive MS. Results: Walking distance increased from 517 to 1884 m in Patient 1 and from 52 to 506 m in Patient 2. Gait velocity did not change significantly in Patient 1 and increased from 0.6 to 0.8 m/s in Patient 2. Maximum deviations of center of mass from the midline to each side changed significantly after 3 months of stimulation compared to baseline, decreasing from 15 to 12 mm in Patient 1 and from 47 to 37 mm in Patient 2. Both patients experienced reduced pain and fatigue and benefits to quality of life. Adverse events did not occur during the observation period. Conclusion: We conclude that implantable 4-channel FES systems are not only feasible but present a promising new alternative for treating central drop foot in MS patients.},
keywords = {ActiGait, adult, article, case report, cerebrovascular accident, clinical evaluation, fatigue, feasibility study, female, functional electrical stimulation, gait, human, male, middle aged, multiple sclerosis, pain, peroneus nerve, peroneus nerve paralysis, priority journal, quality of life, rehabilitation care, therapy effect, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kistenberg, R. S.
Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations Artikel
In: Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am., Bd. 25, Nr. 1, S. 93–115, 2014, ISSN: 1558-1381.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: anatomy, ankle prosthesis, arm amputation, arm movement, arm prosthesis, biomechanics, bone regeneration, C-leg, Delrin, elbow prosthesis, equipment design, finger amputation, functional status, Genium, hand amputation, health care access, Helix3D, hemipelvectomy, hip prosthesis, human, iLIMB Hand, Kevlar, kinematics, knee prosthesis, leg amputation, leg movement, leg prosthesis, microprocessor, motor control, orthopedic shoe, patient preference, physical activity, Power Knee, priority journal, prosthesis complication, public health service, quality of life, rehabilitation care, review, shoulder prosthesis, surgical technique, surgical technology, suspension, thumb amputation
@article{Kistenberg2014,
title = {Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations},
author = {R. S. Kistenberg},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L370343297&from=export},
doi = {10.1016/j.pmr.2013.10.001},
issn = {1558-1381},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am.},
volume = {25},
number = {1},
pages = {93–115},
address = {R.S. Kistenberg, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, 555 14th Street, Atlanta, GA 30318, United States},
abstract = {New technology and materials have advanced prosthetic designs to enable people who rely on artificial limbs to achieve feats never dreamed before. However, the latest and the greatest technology is not appropriate for everyone. The aim of this article is to present contemporary options that are available for people who rely on artificial limbs to enhance their quality of life for mobility and independence. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {anatomy, ankle prosthesis, arm amputation, arm movement, arm prosthesis, biomechanics, bone regeneration, C-leg, Delrin, elbow prosthesis, equipment design, finger amputation, functional status, Genium, hand amputation, health care access, Helix3D, hemipelvectomy, hip prosthesis, human, iLIMB Hand, Kevlar, kinematics, knee prosthesis, leg amputation, leg movement, leg prosthesis, microprocessor, motor control, orthopedic shoe, patient preference, physical activity, Power Knee, priority journal, prosthesis complication, public health service, quality of life, rehabilitation care, review, shoulder prosthesis, surgical technique, surgical technology, suspension, thumb amputation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2015
Hausmann, J.; Sweeney-Reed, C. M.; Sobieray, U.; Matzke, M.; Heinze, H. -J.; Voges, J.; Buentjen, L.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 12, Nr. 1, 2015, ISSN: 1743-0003.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: ActiGait, adult, article, case report, cerebrovascular accident, clinical evaluation, fatigue, feasibility study, female, functional electrical stimulation, gait, human, male, middle aged, multiple sclerosis, pain, peroneus nerve, peroneus nerve paralysis, priority journal, quality of life, rehabilitation care, therapy effect, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator, walking speed
@article{Hausmann2015,
title = {Functional electrical stimulation through direct 4-channel nerve stimulation to improve gait in multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study},
author = {J. Hausmann and C. M. Sweeney-Reed and U. Sobieray and M. Matzke and H. -J. Heinze and J. Voges and L. Buentjen},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L606904897&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-015-0096-3},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {12},
number = {1},
address = {J. Hausmann, Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg, Germany},
abstract = {Background: Gait dysfunction due to lower limb central paralysis, frequently involving drop foot, is a common cause of disability in multiple sclerosis and has been treated with transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (FES). We provide here the first report of 4-channel semi-implantable FES of the peroneal nerve which has been successfully used for rehabilitation in patients following stroke. Methods: FES was implemented via a 4-channel semi-implantable closed-loop system (ActiGait®, ©Ottobock), generating dorsiflexion in drop foot. Walking distance, gait symmetry (temporospatial gait analyses, Vicon Motion Systems®), gait velocity (10 m walking test) and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) were measured to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of this system in two patients with progressive MS. Results: Walking distance increased from 517 to 1884 m in Patient 1 and from 52 to 506 m in Patient 2. Gait velocity did not change significantly in Patient 1 and increased from 0.6 to 0.8 m/s in Patient 2. Maximum deviations of center of mass from the midline to each side changed significantly after 3 months of stimulation compared to baseline, decreasing from 15 to 12 mm in Patient 1 and from 47 to 37 mm in Patient 2. Both patients experienced reduced pain and fatigue and benefits to quality of life. Adverse events did not occur during the observation period. Conclusion: We conclude that implantable 4-channel FES systems are not only feasible but present a promising new alternative for treating central drop foot in MS patients.},
keywords = {ActiGait, adult, article, case report, cerebrovascular accident, clinical evaluation, fatigue, feasibility study, female, functional electrical stimulation, gait, human, male, middle aged, multiple sclerosis, pain, peroneus nerve, peroneus nerve paralysis, priority journal, quality of life, rehabilitation care, therapy effect, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2014
Kistenberg, R. S.
Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations Artikel
In: Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am., Bd. 25, Nr. 1, S. 93–115, 2014, ISSN: 1558-1381.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: anatomy, ankle prosthesis, arm amputation, arm movement, arm prosthesis, biomechanics, bone regeneration, C-leg, Delrin, elbow prosthesis, equipment design, finger amputation, functional status, Genium, hand amputation, health care access, Helix3D, hemipelvectomy, hip prosthesis, human, iLIMB Hand, Kevlar, kinematics, knee prosthesis, leg amputation, leg movement, leg prosthesis, microprocessor, motor control, orthopedic shoe, patient preference, physical activity, Power Knee, priority journal, prosthesis complication, public health service, quality of life, rehabilitation care, review, shoulder prosthesis, surgical technique, surgical technology, suspension, thumb amputation
@article{Kistenberg2014,
title = {Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations},
author = {R. S. Kistenberg},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L370343297&from=export},
doi = {10.1016/j.pmr.2013.10.001},
issn = {1558-1381},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am.},
volume = {25},
number = {1},
pages = {93–115},
address = {R.S. Kistenberg, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, 555 14th Street, Atlanta, GA 30318, United States},
abstract = {New technology and materials have advanced prosthetic designs to enable people who rely on artificial limbs to achieve feats never dreamed before. However, the latest and the greatest technology is not appropriate for everyone. The aim of this article is to present contemporary options that are available for people who rely on artificial limbs to enhance their quality of life for mobility and independence. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {anatomy, ankle prosthesis, arm amputation, arm movement, arm prosthesis, biomechanics, bone regeneration, C-leg, Delrin, elbow prosthesis, equipment design, finger amputation, functional status, Genium, hand amputation, health care access, Helix3D, hemipelvectomy, hip prosthesis, human, iLIMB Hand, Kevlar, kinematics, knee prosthesis, leg amputation, leg movement, leg prosthesis, microprocessor, motor control, orthopedic shoe, patient preference, physical activity, Power Knee, priority journal, prosthesis complication, public health service, quality of life, rehabilitation care, review, shoulder prosthesis, surgical technique, surgical technology, suspension, thumb amputation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2015
Hausmann, J.; Sweeney-Reed, C. M.; Sobieray, U.; Matzke, M.; Heinze, H. -J.; Voges, J.; Buentjen, L.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 12, Nr. 1, 2015, ISSN: 1743-0003.
@article{Hausmann2015,
title = {Functional electrical stimulation through direct 4-channel nerve stimulation to improve gait in multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study},
author = {J. Hausmann and C. M. Sweeney-Reed and U. Sobieray and M. Matzke and H. -J. Heinze and J. Voges and L. Buentjen},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L606904897&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-015-0096-3},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {12},
number = {1},
address = {J. Hausmann, Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg, Germany},
abstract = {Background: Gait dysfunction due to lower limb central paralysis, frequently involving drop foot, is a common cause of disability in multiple sclerosis and has been treated with transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (FES). We provide here the first report of 4-channel semi-implantable FES of the peroneal nerve which has been successfully used for rehabilitation in patients following stroke. Methods: FES was implemented via a 4-channel semi-implantable closed-loop system (ActiGait®, ©Ottobock), generating dorsiflexion in drop foot. Walking distance, gait symmetry (temporospatial gait analyses, Vicon Motion Systems®), gait velocity (10 m walking test) and quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) were measured to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of this system in two patients with progressive MS. Results: Walking distance increased from 517 to 1884 m in Patient 1 and from 52 to 506 m in Patient 2. Gait velocity did not change significantly in Patient 1 and increased from 0.6 to 0.8 m/s in Patient 2. Maximum deviations of center of mass from the midline to each side changed significantly after 3 months of stimulation compared to baseline, decreasing from 15 to 12 mm in Patient 1 and from 47 to 37 mm in Patient 2. Both patients experienced reduced pain and fatigue and benefits to quality of life. Adverse events did not occur during the observation period. Conclusion: We conclude that implantable 4-channel FES systems are not only feasible but present a promising new alternative for treating central drop foot in MS patients.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2014
Kistenberg, R. S.
Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations Artikel
In: Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am., Bd. 25, Nr. 1, S. 93–115, 2014, ISSN: 1558-1381.
@article{Kistenberg2014,
title = {Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations},
author = {R. S. Kistenberg},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L370343297&from=export},
doi = {10.1016/j.pmr.2013.10.001},
issn = {1558-1381},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Am.},
volume = {25},
number = {1},
pages = {93–115},
address = {R.S. Kistenberg, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Applied Physiology, 555 14th Street, Atlanta, GA 30318, United States},
abstract = {New technology and materials have advanced prosthetic designs to enable people who rely on artificial limbs to achieve feats never dreamed before. However, the latest and the greatest technology is not appropriate for everyone. The aim of this article is to present contemporary options that are available for people who rely on artificial limbs to enhance their quality of life for mobility and independence. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}