TPress
1.
Taboga, P.; Beck, O. N.; Grabowski, A. M.
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 15, Nr. 2, 2020, ISSN: 1932-6203.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, aerial time, article, athlete, below knee amputation, below knee prosthesis, biomechanics, clinical article, contact length, contact time, controlled study, Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, ground reaction force, human, male, Ossur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend, Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter, physical parameters, prosthesis design, prosthetic height, prosthetic shape, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, running speed, standing, vertical stiffness, young adult
@article{Taboga2020,
title = {Prosthetic shape, but not stiffness or height, affects the maximum speed of sprinters with bilateral transtibial amputations},
author = {P. Taboga and O. N. Beck and A. M. Grabowski},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2005026109&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0229035},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
address = {P. Taboga, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Sacramento, CA, United States},
abstract = {Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) have facilitated an athlete with bilateral transtibial amputations to compete in the Olympic Games. However, the performance effects of using RSPs compared to biological legs remains controversial. Further, the use of different prosthetic configurations such as shape, stiffness, and height likely influence performance. We determined the effects of using 15 different RSP configurations on the maximum speed of five male athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. These athletes performed sets of running trials up to maximum speed using three different RSP models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) each with five combinations of stiffness category and height. We measured ground reaction forces during each maximum speed trial to determine the biomechanical parameters associated with different RSP configurations and maximum sprinting speeds. Use of the J-shaped Cheetah Xtend and 1E90 Sprinter RSPs resulted in 8.3% and 8.0% (p<0.001) faster maximum speeds compared to the use of the C-shaped Catapult FX6 RSPs, respectively. Neither RSP stiffness expressed as a category (p = 0.836) nor as kNm-1 (p = 0.916) affected maximum speed. Further, prosthetic height had no effect on maximum speed (p = 0.762). Faster maximum speeds were associated with reduced ground contact time, aerial time, and overall leg stiffness, as well as with greater stance-average vertical ground reaction force, contact length, and vertical stiffness (p = 0.015 for aerial time, p<0.001 for all other variables). RSP shape, but not stiffness or height, influences the maximum speed of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.},
keywords = {adult, aerial time, article, athlete, below knee amputation, below knee prosthesis, biomechanics, clinical article, contact length, contact time, controlled study, Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, ground reaction force, human, male, Ossur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend, Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter, physical parameters, prosthesis design, prosthetic height, prosthetic shape, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, running speed, standing, vertical stiffness, young adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) have facilitated an athlete with bilateral transtibial amputations to compete in the Olympic Games. However, the performance effects of using RSPs compared to biological legs remains controversial. Further, the use of different prosthetic configurations such as shape, stiffness, and height likely influence performance. We determined the effects of using 15 different RSP configurations on the maximum speed of five male athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. These athletes performed sets of running trials up to maximum speed using three different RSP models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) each with five combinations of stiffness category and height. We measured ground reaction forces during each maximum speed trial to determine the biomechanical parameters associated with different RSP configurations and maximum sprinting speeds. Use of the J-shaped Cheetah Xtend and 1E90 Sprinter RSPs resulted in 8.3% and 8.0% (p<0.001) faster maximum speeds compared to the use of the C-shaped Catapult FX6 RSPs, respectively. Neither RSP stiffness expressed as a category (p = 0.836) nor as kNm-1 (p = 0.916) affected maximum speed. Further, prosthetic height had no effect on maximum speed (p = 0.762). Faster maximum speeds were associated with reduced ground contact time, aerial time, and overall leg stiffness, as well as with greater stance-average vertical ground reaction force, contact length, and vertical stiffness (p = 0.015 for aerial time, p<0.001 for all other variables). RSP shape, but not stiffness or height, influences the maximum speed of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.
2.
Ernst, M.; Altenburg, B.; Bellmann, M.; Schmalz, T.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 14, Nr. 1, 2017, ISSN: 1743-0003.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, article, autoadaptive dorsiflexion stop, controlled study, foot prosthesis, Genium, ground reaction force, human, human experiment, informed consent, joint angle, joint torque, leg amputation, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic feet, musculoskeletal function, musculoskeletal system parameters, priority journal, standing, task performance, transfemoral amputation, transtibial amputation, vertical ground reaction force
@article{Ernst2017,
title = {Standing on slopes - How current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support transtibial and transfemoral amputees in an everyday task},
author = {M. Ernst and B. Altenburg and M. Bellmann and T. Schmalz},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L619264869&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-017-0322-2},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
address = {M. Ernst, Research Biomechanics, CRandS, Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, Göttingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background: Conventional prosthetic feet like energy storage and return feet provide only a limited range of ankle motion compared to human ones. In order to overcome the poor rotational adaptability, prosthetic manufacturers developed different prosthetic feet with an additional rotational joint and implemented active control in different states. It was the aim of the study to investigate to what extent these commercially available microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support a natural posture while standing on inclines and which concept is most beneficial for lower limb amputees. Methods: Four unilateral transtibial and four unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Each of the subjects wore five different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet in addition to their everyday feet. The subjects were asked to stand on slopes of different inclinations (level ground, upward slope of 10°, and downward slope of -10°). Vertical ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint angles in the sagittal plane were measured for both legs separately for the different situations and compared to a non-amputee reference group. Results: Differences in the biomechanical parameters were observed between the different prosthetic feet and compared to the reference group for the investigated situations. They were most prominent while standing on a downward slope. For example, on the prosthetic side, the vertical ground reaction force is reduced by about 20%, and the torque about the knee acts to flex the joint for feet that are not capable of a full adaptation to the downward slope. In contrast, fully adaptable feet with an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop show no changes in vertical ground reaction forces and knee extending torques. Conclusions: A prosthetic foot that provides both, an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop and a sufficient range of motion for fully adapting to inclinations appears to be the key element in the prosthetic fitting for standing on inclinations in lower limb amputees. In such situations, this prosthetic concept appears superior to both, conventional feet with passive structures as well as feet that solely provide a sufficient range of motion. The results also indicate that both, transfemoral and transtibial amputees benefit from such a foot.},
keywords = {adult, article, autoadaptive dorsiflexion stop, controlled study, foot prosthesis, Genium, ground reaction force, human, human experiment, informed consent, joint angle, joint torque, leg amputation, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic feet, musculoskeletal function, musculoskeletal system parameters, priority journal, standing, task performance, transfemoral amputation, transtibial amputation, vertical ground reaction force},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Conventional prosthetic feet like energy storage and return feet provide only a limited range of ankle motion compared to human ones. In order to overcome the poor rotational adaptability, prosthetic manufacturers developed different prosthetic feet with an additional rotational joint and implemented active control in different states. It was the aim of the study to investigate to what extent these commercially available microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support a natural posture while standing on inclines and which concept is most beneficial for lower limb amputees. Methods: Four unilateral transtibial and four unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Each of the subjects wore five different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet in addition to their everyday feet. The subjects were asked to stand on slopes of different inclinations (level ground, upward slope of 10°, and downward slope of -10°). Vertical ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint angles in the sagittal plane were measured for both legs separately for the different situations and compared to a non-amputee reference group. Results: Differences in the biomechanical parameters were observed between the different prosthetic feet and compared to the reference group for the investigated situations. They were most prominent while standing on a downward slope. For example, on the prosthetic side, the vertical ground reaction force is reduced by about 20%, and the torque about the knee acts to flex the joint for feet that are not capable of a full adaptation to the downward slope. In contrast, fully adaptable feet with an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop show no changes in vertical ground reaction forces and knee extending torques. Conclusions: A prosthetic foot that provides both, an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop and a sufficient range of motion for fully adapting to inclinations appears to be the key element in the prosthetic fitting for standing on inclinations in lower limb amputees. In such situations, this prosthetic concept appears superior to both, conventional feet with passive structures as well as feet that solely provide a sufficient range of motion. The results also indicate that both, transfemoral and transtibial amputees benefit from such a foot.
3.
Pröbsting, E.; Kannenberg, A.; Zacharias, B.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 41, Nr. 1, S. 65–77, 2017, ISSN: 0309-3646.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, aged, ankle foot orthosis, article, C Brace, clinical article, daily life activity, device safety, E MAG Active, female, follow up, Free Walk, Horton SCO, human, KAFO SPL, knee-ankle-foot orthosis, male, microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis, middle aged, NEURO MATIC, patient-reported outcome, standing, very elderly, walking
@article{Proebsting2017,
title = {Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace® Orthotronic Mobility System, a new microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis},
author = {E. Pröbsting and A. Kannenberg and B. Zacharias},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L614321344&from=export},
doi = {10.1177/0309364616637954},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {41},
number = {1},
pages = {65–77},
address = {E. Pröbsting, Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, Department Clinical Research and Services, Goettingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background: There are clear indications for benefits of stance control orthoses compared to locked knee ankle foot orthoses. However, stance control orthoses still have limited function compared with a sound human leg. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis compared to stance control orthoses and locked knee ankle foot orthoses in activities of daily living. Study design: Survey of lower limb orthosis users before and after fitting of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Methods: Thirteen patients with various lower limb pareses completed a baseline survey for their current orthotic device (locked knee ankle foot orthosis or stance control orthosis) and a follow-up for the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with the Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire, a new self-reported outcome measure devised by modifying the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for use in lower limb orthotics and the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Results: The Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire results demonstrated significant improvements by microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis use in the total score and the domains of ambulation (p =.001), paretic limb health (p =.04), sounds (p =.02), and well-being (p =.01). Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire results showed significant improvements with the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with regard to perceived safety and difficulty of activities of daily living. Conclusion: The microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis may facilitate an easier, more physiological, and safer execution of many activities of daily living compared to traditional leg orthosis technologies. Clinical relevance This study compared patient-reported outcomes of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis (C-Brace) to those with traditional knee ankle foot orthosis and stance control orthosis devices. The C-Brace offers new functions including controlled knee flexion during weight bearing and dynamic swing control, resulting in significant improvements in perceived orthotic mobility and safety.},
keywords = {adult, aged, ankle foot orthosis, article, C Brace, clinical article, daily life activity, device safety, E MAG Active, female, follow up, Free Walk, Horton SCO, human, KAFO SPL, knee-ankle-foot orthosis, male, microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis, middle aged, NEURO MATIC, patient-reported outcome, standing, very elderly, walking},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: There are clear indications for benefits of stance control orthoses compared to locked knee ankle foot orthoses. However, stance control orthoses still have limited function compared with a sound human leg. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis compared to stance control orthoses and locked knee ankle foot orthoses in activities of daily living. Study design: Survey of lower limb orthosis users before and after fitting of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Methods: Thirteen patients with various lower limb pareses completed a baseline survey for their current orthotic device (locked knee ankle foot orthosis or stance control orthosis) and a follow-up for the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with the Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire, a new self-reported outcome measure devised by modifying the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for use in lower limb orthotics and the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Results: The Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire results demonstrated significant improvements by microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis use in the total score and the domains of ambulation (p =.001), paretic limb health (p =.04), sounds (p =.02), and well-being (p =.01). Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire results showed significant improvements with the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with regard to perceived safety and difficulty of activities of daily living. Conclusion: The microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis may facilitate an easier, more physiological, and safer execution of many activities of daily living compared to traditional leg orthosis technologies. Clinical relevance This study compared patient-reported outcomes of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis (C-Brace) to those with traditional knee ankle foot orthosis and stance control orthosis devices. The C-Brace offers new functions including controlled knee flexion during weight bearing and dynamic swing control, resulting in significant improvements in perceived orthotic mobility and safety.
4.
Wit, D. C. M.; Buurke, J. H.; Nijlant, J. M. M.; IJzerman, M. J.; Hermens, H. J.
In: Clin. Rehabil., Bd. 18, Nr. 5, S. 550–557, 2004, ISSN: 0269-2155.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, aged, article, Camp, cerebrovascular accident, chronic disease, climbing, clinical article, clinical trial, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, crossover procedure, Distrac, Dynafo, female, gait disorder, human, male, motivation, motor performance, orthosis, Ottobock, randomized controlled trial, scoring system, self esteem, standing, statistical analysis, task performance, walking speed
@article{Wit2004,
title = {The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial},
author = {D. C. M. Wit and J. H. Buurke and J. M. M. Nijlant and M. J. IJzerman and H. J. Hermens},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L39076880&from=export},
doi = {10.1191/0269215504cr770oa},
issn = {0269-2155},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
journal = {Clin. Rehabil.},
volume = {18},
number = {5},
pages = {550–557},
address = {D.C.M. de Wit, Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghbleekweg 33B, 7522 AH Enschede, Netherlands},
abstract = {Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFC) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions. Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85-8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4-4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1-14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO. Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO. © Arnold 2004.},
keywords = {adult, aged, article, Camp, cerebrovascular accident, chronic disease, climbing, clinical article, clinical trial, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, crossover procedure, Distrac, Dynafo, female, gait disorder, human, male, motivation, motor performance, orthosis, Ottobock, randomized controlled trial, scoring system, self esteem, standing, statistical analysis, task performance, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFC) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions. Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85-8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4-4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1-14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO. Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO. © Arnold 2004.
2020
Taboga, P.; Beck, O. N.; Grabowski, A. M.
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 15, Nr. 2, 2020, ISSN: 1932-6203.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, aerial time, article, athlete, below knee amputation, below knee prosthesis, biomechanics, clinical article, contact length, contact time, controlled study, Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, ground reaction force, human, male, Ossur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend, Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter, physical parameters, prosthesis design, prosthetic height, prosthetic shape, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, running speed, standing, vertical stiffness, young adult
@article{Taboga2020,
title = {Prosthetic shape, but not stiffness or height, affects the maximum speed of sprinters with bilateral transtibial amputations},
author = {P. Taboga and O. N. Beck and A. M. Grabowski},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2005026109&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0229035},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
address = {P. Taboga, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Sacramento, CA, United States},
abstract = {Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) have facilitated an athlete with bilateral transtibial amputations to compete in the Olympic Games. However, the performance effects of using RSPs compared to biological legs remains controversial. Further, the use of different prosthetic configurations such as shape, stiffness, and height likely influence performance. We determined the effects of using 15 different RSP configurations on the maximum speed of five male athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. These athletes performed sets of running trials up to maximum speed using three different RSP models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) each with five combinations of stiffness category and height. We measured ground reaction forces during each maximum speed trial to determine the biomechanical parameters associated with different RSP configurations and maximum sprinting speeds. Use of the J-shaped Cheetah Xtend and 1E90 Sprinter RSPs resulted in 8.3% and 8.0% (p<0.001) faster maximum speeds compared to the use of the C-shaped Catapult FX6 RSPs, respectively. Neither RSP stiffness expressed as a category (p = 0.836) nor as kNm-1 (p = 0.916) affected maximum speed. Further, prosthetic height had no effect on maximum speed (p = 0.762). Faster maximum speeds were associated with reduced ground contact time, aerial time, and overall leg stiffness, as well as with greater stance-average vertical ground reaction force, contact length, and vertical stiffness (p = 0.015 for aerial time, p<0.001 for all other variables). RSP shape, but not stiffness or height, influences the maximum speed of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.},
keywords = {adult, aerial time, article, athlete, below knee amputation, below knee prosthesis, biomechanics, clinical article, contact length, contact time, controlled study, Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, ground reaction force, human, male, Ossur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend, Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter, physical parameters, prosthesis design, prosthetic height, prosthetic shape, prosthetic stiffness, running, running specific prosthesis, running speed, standing, vertical stiffness, young adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) have facilitated an athlete with bilateral transtibial amputations to compete in the Olympic Games. However, the performance effects of using RSPs compared to biological legs remains controversial. Further, the use of different prosthetic configurations such as shape, stiffness, and height likely influence performance. We determined the effects of using 15 different RSP configurations on the maximum speed of five male athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. These athletes performed sets of running trials up to maximum speed using three different RSP models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) each with five combinations of stiffness category and height. We measured ground reaction forces during each maximum speed trial to determine the biomechanical parameters associated with different RSP configurations and maximum sprinting speeds. Use of the J-shaped Cheetah Xtend and 1E90 Sprinter RSPs resulted in 8.3% and 8.0% (p<0.001) faster maximum speeds compared to the use of the C-shaped Catapult FX6 RSPs, respectively. Neither RSP stiffness expressed as a category (p = 0.836) nor as kNm-1 (p = 0.916) affected maximum speed. Further, prosthetic height had no effect on maximum speed (p = 0.762). Faster maximum speeds were associated with reduced ground contact time, aerial time, and overall leg stiffness, as well as with greater stance-average vertical ground reaction force, contact length, and vertical stiffness (p = 0.015 for aerial time, p<0.001 for all other variables). RSP shape, but not stiffness or height, influences the maximum speed of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.
2017
Ernst, M.; Altenburg, B.; Bellmann, M.; Schmalz, T.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 14, Nr. 1, 2017, ISSN: 1743-0003.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, article, autoadaptive dorsiflexion stop, controlled study, foot prosthesis, Genium, ground reaction force, human, human experiment, informed consent, joint angle, joint torque, leg amputation, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic feet, musculoskeletal function, musculoskeletal system parameters, priority journal, standing, task performance, transfemoral amputation, transtibial amputation, vertical ground reaction force
@article{Ernst2017,
title = {Standing on slopes - How current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support transtibial and transfemoral amputees in an everyday task},
author = {M. Ernst and B. Altenburg and M. Bellmann and T. Schmalz},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L619264869&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-017-0322-2},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
address = {M. Ernst, Research Biomechanics, CRandS, Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, Göttingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background: Conventional prosthetic feet like energy storage and return feet provide only a limited range of ankle motion compared to human ones. In order to overcome the poor rotational adaptability, prosthetic manufacturers developed different prosthetic feet with an additional rotational joint and implemented active control in different states. It was the aim of the study to investigate to what extent these commercially available microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support a natural posture while standing on inclines and which concept is most beneficial for lower limb amputees. Methods: Four unilateral transtibial and four unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Each of the subjects wore five different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet in addition to their everyday feet. The subjects were asked to stand on slopes of different inclinations (level ground, upward slope of 10°, and downward slope of -10°). Vertical ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint angles in the sagittal plane were measured for both legs separately for the different situations and compared to a non-amputee reference group. Results: Differences in the biomechanical parameters were observed between the different prosthetic feet and compared to the reference group for the investigated situations. They were most prominent while standing on a downward slope. For example, on the prosthetic side, the vertical ground reaction force is reduced by about 20%, and the torque about the knee acts to flex the joint for feet that are not capable of a full adaptation to the downward slope. In contrast, fully adaptable feet with an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop show no changes in vertical ground reaction forces and knee extending torques. Conclusions: A prosthetic foot that provides both, an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop and a sufficient range of motion for fully adapting to inclinations appears to be the key element in the prosthetic fitting for standing on inclinations in lower limb amputees. In such situations, this prosthetic concept appears superior to both, conventional feet with passive structures as well as feet that solely provide a sufficient range of motion. The results also indicate that both, transfemoral and transtibial amputees benefit from such a foot.},
keywords = {adult, article, autoadaptive dorsiflexion stop, controlled study, foot prosthesis, Genium, ground reaction force, human, human experiment, informed consent, joint angle, joint torque, leg amputation, male, microprocessor, microprocessor controlled prosthetic feet, musculoskeletal function, musculoskeletal system parameters, priority journal, standing, task performance, transfemoral amputation, transtibial amputation, vertical ground reaction force},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Conventional prosthetic feet like energy storage and return feet provide only a limited range of ankle motion compared to human ones. In order to overcome the poor rotational adaptability, prosthetic manufacturers developed different prosthetic feet with an additional rotational joint and implemented active control in different states. It was the aim of the study to investigate to what extent these commercially available microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support a natural posture while standing on inclines and which concept is most beneficial for lower limb amputees. Methods: Four unilateral transtibial and four unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Each of the subjects wore five different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet in addition to their everyday feet. The subjects were asked to stand on slopes of different inclinations (level ground, upward slope of 10°, and downward slope of -10°). Vertical ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint angles in the sagittal plane were measured for both legs separately for the different situations and compared to a non-amputee reference group. Results: Differences in the biomechanical parameters were observed between the different prosthetic feet and compared to the reference group for the investigated situations. They were most prominent while standing on a downward slope. For example, on the prosthetic side, the vertical ground reaction force is reduced by about 20%, and the torque about the knee acts to flex the joint for feet that are not capable of a full adaptation to the downward slope. In contrast, fully adaptable feet with an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop show no changes in vertical ground reaction forces and knee extending torques. Conclusions: A prosthetic foot that provides both, an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop and a sufficient range of motion for fully adapting to inclinations appears to be the key element in the prosthetic fitting for standing on inclinations in lower limb amputees. In such situations, this prosthetic concept appears superior to both, conventional feet with passive structures as well as feet that solely provide a sufficient range of motion. The results also indicate that both, transfemoral and transtibial amputees benefit from such a foot.
Pröbsting, E.; Kannenberg, A.; Zacharias, B.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 41, Nr. 1, S. 65–77, 2017, ISSN: 0309-3646.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, aged, ankle foot orthosis, article, C Brace, clinical article, daily life activity, device safety, E MAG Active, female, follow up, Free Walk, Horton SCO, human, KAFO SPL, knee-ankle-foot orthosis, male, microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis, middle aged, NEURO MATIC, patient-reported outcome, standing, very elderly, walking
@article{Proebsting2017,
title = {Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace® Orthotronic Mobility System, a new microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis},
author = {E. Pröbsting and A. Kannenberg and B. Zacharias},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L614321344&from=export},
doi = {10.1177/0309364616637954},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {41},
number = {1},
pages = {65–77},
address = {E. Pröbsting, Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, Department Clinical Research and Services, Goettingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background: There are clear indications for benefits of stance control orthoses compared to locked knee ankle foot orthoses. However, stance control orthoses still have limited function compared with a sound human leg. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis compared to stance control orthoses and locked knee ankle foot orthoses in activities of daily living. Study design: Survey of lower limb orthosis users before and after fitting of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Methods: Thirteen patients with various lower limb pareses completed a baseline survey for their current orthotic device (locked knee ankle foot orthosis or stance control orthosis) and a follow-up for the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with the Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire, a new self-reported outcome measure devised by modifying the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for use in lower limb orthotics and the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Results: The Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire results demonstrated significant improvements by microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis use in the total score and the domains of ambulation (p =.001), paretic limb health (p =.04), sounds (p =.02), and well-being (p =.01). Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire results showed significant improvements with the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with regard to perceived safety and difficulty of activities of daily living. Conclusion: The microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis may facilitate an easier, more physiological, and safer execution of many activities of daily living compared to traditional leg orthosis technologies. Clinical relevance This study compared patient-reported outcomes of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis (C-Brace) to those with traditional knee ankle foot orthosis and stance control orthosis devices. The C-Brace offers new functions including controlled knee flexion during weight bearing and dynamic swing control, resulting in significant improvements in perceived orthotic mobility and safety.},
keywords = {adult, aged, ankle foot orthosis, article, C Brace, clinical article, daily life activity, device safety, E MAG Active, female, follow up, Free Walk, Horton SCO, human, KAFO SPL, knee-ankle-foot orthosis, male, microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis, middle aged, NEURO MATIC, patient-reported outcome, standing, very elderly, walking},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: There are clear indications for benefits of stance control orthoses compared to locked knee ankle foot orthoses. However, stance control orthoses still have limited function compared with a sound human leg. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis compared to stance control orthoses and locked knee ankle foot orthoses in activities of daily living. Study design: Survey of lower limb orthosis users before and after fitting of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Methods: Thirteen patients with various lower limb pareses completed a baseline survey for their current orthotic device (locked knee ankle foot orthosis or stance control orthosis) and a follow-up for the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with the Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire, a new self-reported outcome measure devised by modifying the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for use in lower limb orthotics and the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Results: The Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire results demonstrated significant improvements by microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis use in the total score and the domains of ambulation (p =.001), paretic limb health (p =.04), sounds (p =.02), and well-being (p =.01). Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire results showed significant improvements with the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with regard to perceived safety and difficulty of activities of daily living. Conclusion: The microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis may facilitate an easier, more physiological, and safer execution of many activities of daily living compared to traditional leg orthosis technologies. Clinical relevance This study compared patient-reported outcomes of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis (C-Brace) to those with traditional knee ankle foot orthosis and stance control orthosis devices. The C-Brace offers new functions including controlled knee flexion during weight bearing and dynamic swing control, resulting in significant improvements in perceived orthotic mobility and safety.
2004
Wit, D. C. M.; Buurke, J. H.; Nijlant, J. M. M.; IJzerman, M. J.; Hermens, H. J.
In: Clin. Rehabil., Bd. 18, Nr. 5, S. 550–557, 2004, ISSN: 0269-2155.
Abstract | Links | Schlagwörter: adult, aged, article, Camp, cerebrovascular accident, chronic disease, climbing, clinical article, clinical trial, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, crossover procedure, Distrac, Dynafo, female, gait disorder, human, male, motivation, motor performance, orthosis, Ottobock, randomized controlled trial, scoring system, self esteem, standing, statistical analysis, task performance, walking speed
@article{Wit2004,
title = {The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial},
author = {D. C. M. Wit and J. H. Buurke and J. M. M. Nijlant and M. J. IJzerman and H. J. Hermens},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L39076880&from=export},
doi = {10.1191/0269215504cr770oa},
issn = {0269-2155},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
journal = {Clin. Rehabil.},
volume = {18},
number = {5},
pages = {550–557},
address = {D.C.M. de Wit, Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghbleekweg 33B, 7522 AH Enschede, Netherlands},
abstract = {Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFC) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions. Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85-8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4-4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1-14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO. Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO. © Arnold 2004.},
keywords = {adult, aged, article, Camp, cerebrovascular accident, chronic disease, climbing, clinical article, clinical trial, controlled clinical trial, controlled study, crossover procedure, Distrac, Dynafo, female, gait disorder, human, male, motivation, motor performance, orthosis, Ottobock, randomized controlled trial, scoring system, self esteem, standing, statistical analysis, task performance, walking speed},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFC) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions. Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85-8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4-4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1-14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO. Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO. © Arnold 2004.
2020
Taboga, P.; Beck, O. N.; Grabowski, A. M.
In: PLoS ONE, Bd. 15, Nr. 2, 2020, ISSN: 1932-6203.
@article{Taboga2020,
title = {Prosthetic shape, but not stiffness or height, affects the maximum speed of sprinters with bilateral transtibial amputations},
author = {P. Taboga and O. N. Beck and A. M. Grabowski},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L2005026109&from=export},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0229035},
issn = {1932-6203},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
address = {P. Taboga, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Sacramento, CA, United States},
abstract = {Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) have facilitated an athlete with bilateral transtibial amputations to compete in the Olympic Games. However, the performance effects of using RSPs compared to biological legs remains controversial. Further, the use of different prosthetic configurations such as shape, stiffness, and height likely influence performance. We determined the effects of using 15 different RSP configurations on the maximum speed of five male athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. These athletes performed sets of running trials up to maximum speed using three different RSP models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) each with five combinations of stiffness category and height. We measured ground reaction forces during each maximum speed trial to determine the biomechanical parameters associated with different RSP configurations and maximum sprinting speeds. Use of the J-shaped Cheetah Xtend and 1E90 Sprinter RSPs resulted in 8.3% and 8.0% (p<0.001) faster maximum speeds compared to the use of the C-shaped Catapult FX6 RSPs, respectively. Neither RSP stiffness expressed as a category (p = 0.836) nor as kNm-1 (p = 0.916) affected maximum speed. Further, prosthetic height had no effect on maximum speed (p = 0.762). Faster maximum speeds were associated with reduced ground contact time, aerial time, and overall leg stiffness, as well as with greater stance-average vertical ground reaction force, contact length, and vertical stiffness (p = 0.015 for aerial time, p<0.001 for all other variables). RSP shape, but not stiffness or height, influences the maximum speed of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Running-specific prostheses (RSPs) have facilitated an athlete with bilateral transtibial amputations to compete in the Olympic Games. However, the performance effects of using RSPs compared to biological legs remains controversial. Further, the use of different prosthetic configurations such as shape, stiffness, and height likely influence performance. We determined the effects of using 15 different RSP configurations on the maximum speed of five male athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations. These athletes performed sets of running trials up to maximum speed using three different RSP models (Freedom Innovations Catapult FX6, Össur Flex-Foot Cheetah Xtend and Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter) each with five combinations of stiffness category and height. We measured ground reaction forces during each maximum speed trial to determine the biomechanical parameters associated with different RSP configurations and maximum sprinting speeds. Use of the J-shaped Cheetah Xtend and 1E90 Sprinter RSPs resulted in 8.3% and 8.0% (p<0.001) faster maximum speeds compared to the use of the C-shaped Catapult FX6 RSPs, respectively. Neither RSP stiffness expressed as a category (p = 0.836) nor as kNm-1 (p = 0.916) affected maximum speed. Further, prosthetic height had no effect on maximum speed (p = 0.762). Faster maximum speeds were associated with reduced ground contact time, aerial time, and overall leg stiffness, as well as with greater stance-average vertical ground reaction force, contact length, and vertical stiffness (p = 0.015 for aerial time, p<0.001 for all other variables). RSP shape, but not stiffness or height, influences the maximum speed of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations.
2017
Ernst, M.; Altenburg, B.; Bellmann, M.; Schmalz, T.
In: J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., Bd. 14, Nr. 1, 2017, ISSN: 1743-0003.
@article{Ernst2017,
title = {Standing on slopes - How current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support transtibial and transfemoral amputees in an everyday task},
author = {M. Ernst and B. Altenburg and M. Bellmann and T. Schmalz},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L619264869&from=export},
doi = {10.1186/s12984-017-0322-2},
issn = {1743-0003},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
address = {M. Ernst, Research Biomechanics, CRandS, Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, Göttingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background: Conventional prosthetic feet like energy storage and return feet provide only a limited range of ankle motion compared to human ones. In order to overcome the poor rotational adaptability, prosthetic manufacturers developed different prosthetic feet with an additional rotational joint and implemented active control in different states. It was the aim of the study to investigate to what extent these commercially available microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support a natural posture while standing on inclines and which concept is most beneficial for lower limb amputees. Methods: Four unilateral transtibial and four unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Each of the subjects wore five different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet in addition to their everyday feet. The subjects were asked to stand on slopes of different inclinations (level ground, upward slope of 10°, and downward slope of -10°). Vertical ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint angles in the sagittal plane were measured for both legs separately for the different situations and compared to a non-amputee reference group. Results: Differences in the biomechanical parameters were observed between the different prosthetic feet and compared to the reference group for the investigated situations. They were most prominent while standing on a downward slope. For example, on the prosthetic side, the vertical ground reaction force is reduced by about 20%, and the torque about the knee acts to flex the joint for feet that are not capable of a full adaptation to the downward slope. In contrast, fully adaptable feet with an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop show no changes in vertical ground reaction forces and knee extending torques. Conclusions: A prosthetic foot that provides both, an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop and a sufficient range of motion for fully adapting to inclinations appears to be the key element in the prosthetic fitting for standing on inclinations in lower limb amputees. In such situations, this prosthetic concept appears superior to both, conventional feet with passive structures as well as feet that solely provide a sufficient range of motion. The results also indicate that both, transfemoral and transtibial amputees benefit from such a foot.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Conventional prosthetic feet like energy storage and return feet provide only a limited range of ankle motion compared to human ones. In order to overcome the poor rotational adaptability, prosthetic manufacturers developed different prosthetic feet with an additional rotational joint and implemented active control in different states. It was the aim of the study to investigate to what extent these commercially available microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet support a natural posture while standing on inclines and which concept is most beneficial for lower limb amputees. Methods: Four unilateral transtibial and four unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. Each of the subjects wore five different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic feet in addition to their everyday feet. The subjects were asked to stand on slopes of different inclinations (level ground, upward slope of 10°, and downward slope of -10°). Vertical ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint angles in the sagittal plane were measured for both legs separately for the different situations and compared to a non-amputee reference group. Results: Differences in the biomechanical parameters were observed between the different prosthetic feet and compared to the reference group for the investigated situations. They were most prominent while standing on a downward slope. For example, on the prosthetic side, the vertical ground reaction force is reduced by about 20%, and the torque about the knee acts to flex the joint for feet that are not capable of a full adaptation to the downward slope. In contrast, fully adaptable feet with an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop show no changes in vertical ground reaction forces and knee extending torques. Conclusions: A prosthetic foot that provides both, an auto-adaptive dorsiflexion stop and a sufficient range of motion for fully adapting to inclinations appears to be the key element in the prosthetic fitting for standing on inclinations in lower limb amputees. In such situations, this prosthetic concept appears superior to both, conventional feet with passive structures as well as feet that solely provide a sufficient range of motion. The results also indicate that both, transfemoral and transtibial amputees benefit from such a foot.
Pröbsting, E.; Kannenberg, A.; Zacharias, B.
In: Prosthet. Orthot. Int., Bd. 41, Nr. 1, S. 65–77, 2017, ISSN: 0309-3646.
@article{Proebsting2017,
title = {Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace® Orthotronic Mobility System, a new microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis},
author = {E. Pröbsting and A. Kannenberg and B. Zacharias},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L614321344&from=export},
doi = {10.1177/0309364616637954},
issn = {0309-3646},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Prosthet. Orthot. Int.},
volume = {41},
number = {1},
pages = {65–77},
address = {E. Pröbsting, Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, Department Clinical Research and Services, Goettingen, Germany},
abstract = {Background: There are clear indications for benefits of stance control orthoses compared to locked knee ankle foot orthoses. However, stance control orthoses still have limited function compared with a sound human leg. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis compared to stance control orthoses and locked knee ankle foot orthoses in activities of daily living. Study design: Survey of lower limb orthosis users before and after fitting of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Methods: Thirteen patients with various lower limb pareses completed a baseline survey for their current orthotic device (locked knee ankle foot orthosis or stance control orthosis) and a follow-up for the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with the Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire, a new self-reported outcome measure devised by modifying the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for use in lower limb orthotics and the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Results: The Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire results demonstrated significant improvements by microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis use in the total score and the domains of ambulation (p =.001), paretic limb health (p =.04), sounds (p =.02), and well-being (p =.01). Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire results showed significant improvements with the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with regard to perceived safety and difficulty of activities of daily living. Conclusion: The microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis may facilitate an easier, more physiological, and safer execution of many activities of daily living compared to traditional leg orthosis technologies. Clinical relevance This study compared patient-reported outcomes of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis (C-Brace) to those with traditional knee ankle foot orthosis and stance control orthosis devices. The C-Brace offers new functions including controlled knee flexion during weight bearing and dynamic swing control, resulting in significant improvements in perceived orthotic mobility and safety.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: There are clear indications for benefits of stance control orthoses compared to locked knee ankle foot orthoses. However, stance control orthoses still have limited function compared with a sound human leg. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis compared to stance control orthoses and locked knee ankle foot orthoses in activities of daily living. Study design: Survey of lower limb orthosis users before and after fitting of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis. Methods: Thirteen patients with various lower limb pareses completed a baseline survey for their current orthotic device (locked knee ankle foot orthosis or stance control orthosis) and a follow-up for the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with the Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire, a new self-reported outcome measure devised by modifying the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for use in lower limb orthotics and the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire. Results: The Orthosis Evaluation Questionnaire results demonstrated significant improvements by microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis use in the total score and the domains of ambulation (p =.001), paretic limb health (p =.04), sounds (p =.02), and well-being (p =.01). Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire results showed significant improvements with the microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis with regard to perceived safety and difficulty of activities of daily living. Conclusion: The microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis may facilitate an easier, more physiological, and safer execution of many activities of daily living compared to traditional leg orthosis technologies. Clinical relevance This study compared patient-reported outcomes of a microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis (C-Brace) to those with traditional knee ankle foot orthosis and stance control orthosis devices. The C-Brace offers new functions including controlled knee flexion during weight bearing and dynamic swing control, resulting in significant improvements in perceived orthotic mobility and safety.
2004
Wit, D. C. M.; Buurke, J. H.; Nijlant, J. M. M.; IJzerman, M. J.; Hermens, H. J.
In: Clin. Rehabil., Bd. 18, Nr. 5, S. 550–557, 2004, ISSN: 0269-2155.
@article{Wit2004,
title = {The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial},
author = {D. C. M. Wit and J. H. Buurke and J. M. M. Nijlant and M. J. IJzerman and H. J. Hermens},
url = {https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L39076880&from=export},
doi = {10.1191/0269215504cr770oa},
issn = {0269-2155},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
journal = {Clin. Rehabil.},
volume = {18},
number = {5},
pages = {550–557},
address = {D.C.M. de Wit, Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghbleekweg 33B, 7522 AH Enschede, Netherlands},
abstract = {Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFC) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions. Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85-8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4-4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1-14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO. Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO. © Arnold 2004.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Objective: Regaining walking ability is a major goal during the rehabilitation of stroke patients. To support this process an ankle-foot orthosis (AFC) is often prescribed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an AFO on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. Design: Cross-over design with randomization for the interventions. Methods: Twenty chronic stroke patients, wearing an AFO for at least six months, were included. Walking ability was operationalized as comfortable walking speed, scores on the timed up and go (TUG) test and stairs test. Patients were measured with and without their AFO, the sequence of which was randomized. Additionally, subjective impressions of self-confidence and difficulty of the tasks were scored. Clinically relevant differences based on literature were defined for walking speed (20 cm/s), the TUG test (10 s). Gathered data were statistically analysed using a paired t-test. Results: The mean difference in favour of the AFO in walking speed was 4.8 cm/s (95% CI 0.85-8.7), in the TUG test 3.6 s (95% CI 2.4-4.8) and in the stairs test 8.6 s (95% CI 3.1-14.1). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced less difficulty and 70% of the patients felt more self-confident while wearing the AFO. Conclusions: The effect of an AFO on walking ability is statistically significant, but compared with the a priori defined differences it is too small to be clinically relevant. The effect on self-confidence suggests that other factors might play an important role in the motivation to use an AFO. © Arnold 2004.